No más! (consecutive posts)

Well, that’s not true; I’m sure there will be additional consecutive posts, but not deliberately.

“What the heck are you talking about!?”

This is the 61st consecutive day that I’ve published something. To be clear, a blog post, and not a book. I remain — explicably — unpublished.

I should explain . . . WordPress does this thing where once you have a few days in a row that you post something, it sends you a congratulatory acknowledgment. At first, I wasn’t trying, but once it got to a few weeks, it had become a habit. More than a habit, actually; I was addicted.

OK, so addicted is a little strong . . .

. . . but you get this little jolt when you read the notification:

“You’re on a 60-day streak on Disperser Tracks!

. . . it feels like you accomplished something.

So, after a few weeks, I started making the effort. I have scheduled stuff I post on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Sundays. . . I just needed stuff for the other four days and, after a while, it became a chore. Many evenings I would rush to get a post out before midnight, keeping the streak alive.

Nota Bene: because of Time Zones, the only temporal place where my streak was alive was in the Central Daylight Time Zone.

Two months, I said . . . 61 consecutive days. . . and here we are. Did it make a difference? Did it accomplish anything?

They tell you consistency helps drive visitors to your blog . . . they lie.

If anything, it burdens loyal followers with too much to read . . . especially because a good number of my posts are the opposite of short. I suppose I’d have more followers if my posts were shorter. You know, like only 30 photos instead of 90, and only 200 words instead of 2,000.

But, that ain’t me, Bob.

“So, if anything, what did the streak accomplish?”

Weren’t you paying attention? Mostly it taxed loyal readers, probably shortening their free time and pressuring them to keep up.

“No extra visitors or views?”

Nope! . . . well, there was one day; the day before the autumnal equinox (unless you live in other parts of the world, where it might have been two days before, and might also be called the vernal equinox).

“Whiskey Tango Foxtrot are you babbling about?”

Sorry . . . September 21, is what I mean. On that day, my views went nuts. I had 1,023 views . . . but just the regular number of visitors, likes, and comments. It was strange enough that I got in touch with WP to have them check if there’s something weird going on. Rather, why there was something weird going on. They said all is right with the world.

I don’t think so; normally, I get 50 views or so, and on a good day, maybe 80, but that’s usually when I get a comment, and I respond, then the commenter responds, then I respond, then they leave a like . . . etc.

Meaning, there are extra views, but no extra visitors. Except on that day . . . at one point, I could literally see the counter change on the fly. I presume it was a bot of some kind because no one could read my posts that fast.

Before you ask, I don’t normally check my stats, but I got a notice from WP. The notice read:

Your stats are booming! Disperser Tracks is getting lots of traffic!

I wasn’t expecting to see over 900 views and the counter changing every few seconds, I tell you what!

Curiously, it all stopped while I was on the chat with Support. I don’t know if they did something, or—dum dum DUM—it was them all along!

Has this happened to anyone else out there?

Mind you, the help desk said it might have been someone on the home page and just scrolling . . . except that gets counted as Home Page Views (I’d previously done a test). And, yes, there were 592 Home Page views, probably from the reader. You’ve heard of ‘butt dialing‘? My guess is that was ‘butt-scrolling‘ . . . someone probably sat on their reader, and it just scrolled.

But that doesn’t take into account the 55 views of the ‘About’ Page, and over four hundred views of individual posts, a mix of old and new posts. The thing is, I only had 47 visitors . . . and on average, each visitor looked at 21 posts.

But, I digress.

“Yes, often.”

OK, OK . . . the point is, no post tomorrow, and maybe no post on Saturday; I’m giving my readers a break. Yes, I’ll still keep to the scheduled posts (Mondays, Wednesdays, and Sundays), and, going forward, additional posts will be less frequent . . . maybe only six a week as opposed to seven (yes, it’s an attempt at humor).

Anyway, so much for the 61st consecutive post . . . enjoy the break.

That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.

<><><><o><><><><><o><><><>

Note: if you are not reading this blog post at DisperserTracks.com, know that it’s copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intentions, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.

Note 2: it’s perfectly OK to share a link that points back here.

<><><><o><><><><><o><><><>

If you’re new to this blog, it might be a good idea to read the FAQ page. If you’re considering subscribing to this blog, it’s definitely a good idea to read both the About page and the FAQ page.

15 thoughts on “No más! (consecutive posts)

Add yours

      1. This was more of an all-day affair, and while it could be a bot, they don’t typically open the posts; they just read tags.

        Regardless, it was a one-time deal. If it happens again, I’ll look a bit more into it (meaning, WP said they would look into it).

        Like

  1. Your choice is in harmony with my recent need to limit PC time altogether due to eye/vision issues. Now I won’t “feel bad” that I can’t keep up with your posts.

    Like

    1. Probably not just you. A few regulars also dropped off the radar, but that could also be because of other stuff (war, social and political strife and unrest, the economy, bad weather, and too much broccoli), and not just because I embarked on a two-months posting spree.

      Although, I had project 313, and others that spanned a few months or more, not to mention one year (2014) when I went nuts and had 505 posts.

      Even so, my best year for interactions and reader engagement was 2020 . . . because everyone was trapped and starved for content; any content. And, no, I’m not hoping for another pandemic just to boost my numbers . . . at least I don’t think I am.

      Regardless, neither you nor anyone should ever feel bad about missing any of my posts.

      As I often mention — and mean — most of this stuff is for me, and if it’s incidentally interesting to anyone else, well, that’s just gravy on the post . . . which makes it a bit messy, but it’s ok.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. It were-ant me!
    But congrats to you on 61 consecutive days!
    I’ve never gotten that message from WP! Ha, I wonder if they have a “Congrats! You’ve posted 4 times this month!” announcement! I could earn that one! HA!
    When I first started blogging, eons ago…I always tried to put up a post 3-5 times a week. But things have changed in my blogging habits over the years. And weirdly my life is busier instead of less busy these days. If I was less busy, I might try to shoot for that again. But, don’t hold your breath whilst waiting! HA!
    I really enjoy when you share stats. They are interesting to me. I should check mine sometime.
    Post when you can, when you want to, and I will read.
    (((HUGS))) to you and Melisa! 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I don’t think any one person will take credit for looking at 900+ of my posts . . . maybe two or three people working in concert and then sharing the treasures they found, but not just one.

      There might be a misunderstanding about the above post . . . I have enough ideas and material to do three daily posts (or one very long one). The issue is time; commitment at my end and investment at the reader’s end.

      Basically, there’s a lot I want to document (my stay in Long Beach, the Panama Cruise, the NECA Cruise, and miscellaneous stuff galore), but some of that stuff requires an effort of multiple days. If doing daily posts, it’s difficult to do other stuff.

      The three scheduled weekly posts (Jokes, Wordless, and SmugMug) are a way to free me up to work on stuff while still posting since they don’t require much time to author; the Jokes are already processed, the Wordless is just revisiting photos from previous posts (from 8 years ago) and throwing in some of the hundreds of jokes I have saved, and the SmugMug is a way to bring new readers (if there be any) some of what went on before.

      That seems in conflict with what I said before, but I believe you do need some heartbeats to the blog, or people will just assume it’s dead.

      Anyway, thanks for the comment.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. I should point out that brevity in a post does not ensure heavier traffic. No one has briefer (?) posts than I do. If it weren’t for cheezy Snapple bottle cap trivia there is nothing to read. The last time I looked at my stats was in early 2020, just before going deep into a global pandemic where you would think folks would spend more time looking at their computers and hoping to find some amusing piece of crap to fill their long days. It didn’t work for me so I just posted less frequently. If I looked at my stats now I’m sure they would be dismal. Like you, I removed the “LIKE” button so I’m not reminded of the slow traffic on a daily basis. Still, 61 days of steady posts are something to be proud of. They can’t take that away.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Your quality of photos is so high that it probably puts less hardy folks than me to shame, and they’d rather forget about them than keep visiting and be constantly reminded of their failings as photographers and photographic content providers. Me? I like the challenge.

      By the way, my removal of the Like button was in response to getting vacuous ‘likes’ . . . ‘likes’ that would show up seconds after I posted something. For me, they were a reminder that much of the “visitors’ data is meaningless; most don’t read anything, passing through the blogs like farts through thin Aberdeen fabric.

      Those ‘visitors’ hit ‘Like’ primarily as a way to spread their identity around, hoping to get some hits in return.

      If a gun were to be held to my head — assuming someone would get the drop on me before I could return fire — and I was asked for an honest guess about the number of regular readers of my blog, I would say at least four, and possibly as many as six . . . and that’s me being optimistic.

      Like

Voice your opinion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑