A quick post about stats

Dream by Wombo abstract

I came across something recently that has me puzzled. It has to do with stats, something I don’t look at too often.

This next image is a screen capture from today’s Jetpack Stats. It’s the numbers for the last seven days and the weekly numbers,

I want to draw attention to the 7-day highlights. No, it’s not the fact it shows a drop in the numbers. Before I go on, here’s the screenshot of the visitors broken down by country . . .

I bring this up because Google Analytics recently began sending me reports about this site. I’d set it up a long time ago, and I’d forgotten about it, but they just changed the way they report the numbers and wanted to entice me into buying services from them.

I won’t, but the reports have me puzzled . . .

They are showing roughly the same number of daily users, but look at the stats for where those users come from . . .

Do you notice a discrepancy in the reports? Specifically, the numbers from China?

By the way, you can click on the images for larger views.

Anyway, it’s showing almost as many viewers from China as I get in the US. In the past weeks, it’s occasionally been very close, with as many users from China as I get from the US, but the Jetpack numbers don’t reflect that. In fact, they’re nowhere close.

Mind you, perhaps I’m not reading these charts correctly, but they seem fairly straightforward (as is the help sections explaining what I’m looking at). Also, that chart is for the past 4 weeks, but if I look at the monthly for Jetpack, I don’t see anything like those numbers for China. Canada is also off, showing more in Jetpack than in Analytics.

I suppose I could ask WP Support to explain to me what I’m looking at but — frankly — I trust Jetpack far less than Google Analytics. I say that although I seem to remember something about Google Analytics being tied to Jetpack, but it could be dementia kicking in.

It also helps that Analytics confirms some things I had already figured out about my so-called subscribers and visitors . . .

If you open that plot, you’ll notice that my Firefly post about Serenity’s plans still draws more visitors than any current post, and by not a small margin, either.

The daily average of visitors is a tad higher than I thought, but not much.

What’s interesting is the engagement, which is shown a bit better here:

I may get lots of visits, but if you look at the engagement averages, four users account for the majority of the engagement sessions and times. The rest are doing a good imitation of the Griswolds at the Grand Canyon.

There’s one positive thing I saw; more than two-thirds of visitors are on a PC. That means that there’s at least a chance the majority of visitors are seeing my pictures on a large enough screen to do them some justice . . . unless people are on laptops. Still, even so, the majority of users are on devices with high screen resolution.

But that bit about where the visitors are coming from has me a bit confused.

Mind you, there are a lot of people in China, so it makes sense there’s a good chance they should be represented in large numbers . . . but that’s not true of India (only 9 visitors versus 214 for China). India also has a significant number of people, but they’re obviously less interested in my blog than the Chinese.

I’m not going to lose any sleep over it because, as I said, I rarely look at stats, and I already know that there’s only a handful of people who regularly engage with the blog . . . literally. The majority of visitors barely look at the photos, and they certainly don’t read anything.

. . . and that’s OK.

That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.

<><><><o><><><><><o><><><>

Note: if you are not reading this blog post at DisperserTracks.com, know that it’s copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intentions, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.

Note 2: it’s perfectly OK to share a link that points back here.

<><><><o><><><><><o><><><>

If you’re new to this blog, it might be a good idea to read the FAQ page. If you’re considering subscribing to this blog, it’s definitely a good idea to read both the About page and the FAQ page.

9 thoughts on “A quick post about stats

Add yours

  1. Excellent abstract on that first photo!

    As for the stats, my logical conclusion is that the results from both sites should match.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Your post provides a very good reason for not taking any web stats too seriously. If two methods are used and the results differ, then both sets are suspect.

    Also, I’d be interested to know how either of them counts or ignores web-crawlers and how accurately they can determine that.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Well, they confirmed a couple of things I knew . . . that stats matter little, that few people read what I write, and that 13 years, tens of thousand of photos, and probably a million+ words isn’t making me an “influencer” . . . could it be I’m not forwarding the right message?

      . . . gosh, I sure hope so.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. You’re not shallow enough to be called an “influencer” and you need to take a few lessons in combining a new found narcissism with controversial opinions.

    Then stop blogging and go weaponise TikTok. 😨

    Like

  4. These stats are weird, for sure. Confusing.
    It’s late and all the numbers are negative for my pea-brain. Ha.
    Oh! and HA! on the Griswolds at the Grand Canyon.
    (((HUGS))) and Happy Sat-Day!!!
    PS…A joke for today….11 out of 10 people don’t understand statistics. HA!

    Like

    1. Thank you Carolyn, and the same wish to you for a nice weekend.

      That scene from the Griswolds has stuck with me all these years, and it’s something we re-enact in some places we visit.

      Statistics humor:
      “Have you heard the latest statistics joke?”
      “Probably.”

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to disperser Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑