Fantastic Females

For them not interested in reading, you can see the photos in THIS<<link SmugMug Gallery.  

I have a feeling traffic will be heavy for this post . . . and that — having come here with different expectations — most will quickly leave.

That’s right . . . this post is about female birds. Wait, let me be clearer; non-human birds.

Click for larger view
Click for larger view

So, Project FeederWatch<<link — by The Cornell Lab of Ornithology — has been running weekly contests (and I’ve missed a number of weeks). This week, it’s “Fantastic Females; Celebrating the muted tones of female birds”. Anyone wanting to see the current submissions can click this LINK.

Now, I’m always reluctant to enter contests (although I’ve entered a few<<link — warning: there are nine pages of posts), and I’ll tell you why.

It’s because I suck . . . er . . . I mean, it’s because the judges have no taste . . . no, wait . . . OK, OK, it’s because there are mucho many better photographers out there than me. Same with writing, and pretty much everything I do. The thing is, I’m pretty good at many things, but excel in none.

Let me assure my readers . . . I know perfectly well I won’t win. I know it without a shadow of a doubt and I’m perfectly OK with it. The main — and sole — reason to submit is that it gives me a chance to do these kinds of posts. So, if you appreciate the photos, great, but don’t worry about encouraging me or wishing me luck, etc. etc.

OK, on with the photos (pay attention; there’s a poll at the end) . . . my first thought was to pick one of my many female hummingbirds photos . . .

 

 

However, if you look at the current submissions, there are already hummingbirds on there. Now, if the contest was based on quantity, well, then, I think I’d have a chance (just go to SmugMug and search for ‘hummingbirds’).

But, I can only submit one photo, and while I thought my photos are as good or better than some of the submissions, I wanted something that wasn’t as well represented. For instance, I like these lady cardinal photos, but there are a lot of cardinals photos already submitted (including some males from people who either didn’t read the guidelines or can’t tell the difference).

Same for other birds . . . except for Tree swallows. I see a few, but not many. Right, then, Tree swallows it is!

Right away, I thought of one of my favorite photos . . .

Option No. 1

The thing is, that photo was submitted in a previous contest . . . and a number of other contestants (and two judges) accused me of submitting a composite image (meaning, a photo made up of different photos).

I ended up having to submit the original RAW file to the judges to clear my name, but by then, I was thoroughly pissed off and I withdrew from the contest (not that — as I already explained — I would have won … especially after calling into question the integrity of the judges).

So, I don’t want to go through that again, do I? . . . but I have other photos of the female parent feeding her brood.

Option No. 2
Option No. 3
Option No. 4

If you want to read the post with more of those photos click this LINK.

Anyway, I like those action photos, and they might even do well, but I wanted to stick closer to the description of the contest, specifically, the colors. And, for that, I need closeups.

Well, it turns out Tree swallows liked to perch on the deck of our house in Colorado . . . and they didn’t mind me standing a few feet away and snapping photos. Pretty grateful, I was.

So, here are some considerations for possible submissions . . .

. . . and, fair warning, I’m going to repeat myself. Meaning, I really like this shot . . .

Option No. 5

. . . and I really like these two shots . . .

Option No. 6
Option No. 7

. . . but I really like these two for showing the colors . . .

Option No. 8
Option No. 9

How do we know those are females, you ask? Well, this is what males look like . . .

OK, they are pretty close, but, in person, and when they are perched a few feet from you, you can easily tell them apart. Basically, the males have bolder colors.  It also helps when you are shooting the female and the male is three feet away and to the side.

Anyway, back to the contest . . . as I said, I really like all of those . . . but this is what I’m going with . . .

Option No. 10

 

So, that’s my choice . . . which is your favorite? You can comment below and mention the number in the captions of the photos.

Oh, that’s right, I promised a poll . . .

 

Here’s a gallery of the above choices:

That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.

<><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><>

Note: if you are not reading this blog post at DisperserTracks.com, know that it’s copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intentions, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.

<><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><>

If you’re new to this blog, it might be a good idea to read the FAQ page. If you’re considering subscribing to this blog, it’s definitively a good idea to read both the About page and the FAQ page.

14 thoughts on “Fantastic Females

Add yours

  1. About the images: Awesome! For most, it would be hard to imagine anything “better” in terms of content, story, clarity and photographic quality etc., Just words, …but the images speak loads for themselves. You should have held the judges accountable for your integrity. M 🙂

    Like

    1. Thank you, mvschulze, very kind of you to say.

      As for the judges, I did speak my mind, perhaps a bit forcefully, especially since some of the entries they had no problems with violated the spirit of the contest if not the actual rules.

      These days, I’m just happy doing my thing here and occasionally sending a photo in to be mostly ignored. This contest is specific to bird lovers, so I know that at least a few will appreciate what I submit.

      However, like many contests these days, is not really a contest on the merit of the photo . . . it’s a popularity contest, where readers vote for their favorite photo. The thing is, many people who submit then point their friends to the photo and ask them to vote for them (I stopped reading those blogs as they are not my kind of people). That said, I looked at the previous winners and they at least make some sense.

      But, I rarely understand the judges’s decisions when it comes to photos (and even stories, when I went to the writing workshop). Whatever it is they look for, it eludes me.

      Don’t take this as me complaining. I’m happy with my stuff and the few who like it, so, again, thank you.

      Like

  2. Option #2, 8 and 10 are great, but too many for a favorite.

    And, I’m not going to encourage you or wish you luck!

    Like

    1. Thanks, AnnMarie, and I understand about the favorites . . . I’m going with my gut instinct and the fact that’s an old favorite of mine, but I could easily justify choosing any one of them for the contest.

      Like

    1. Thanks, JenT. #9 was my second choice (then #5, #8, and #2). I quickly submitted #10 just so I wouldn’t second guess my gut feeling for what to submit because I kept going back and forth.

      #10 was submitted with the caption “Flirty Tree Swallow” and while I think #9 is technically superior as a photo (sharpness, composition, colors), #10 has been a long-term favorite of mine from the first time I saw it.

      Of course, I still think #1 is a great action photo.

      One other consideration when I participate in a contest . . . by submitting, you give up a lot of rights to your photo. I often don’t submit the “better photo” because I don’t want them to have it for free (they retain the right to use all the submissions without having to pay the photographer anything — you could call it getting a lot of material on the cheap).

      While I like what I submitted, it’s not likely to be used much because it’s technically flawed (not as sharp, some details are blown out, not as large since it’s a crop, etc. etc.), but, if it is, c’est la vie; perhaps it will brighten someone’s day.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Well, dang! I could have been somebody! I could have been a contender! Instead of an “also ran”!

      If only I’d have heard from you guys before . . .

      . . . I probably still would have submitted #10 for the reasons stated above.

      Like

  3. Oh! What lovely ladies! I think they are all gorgeous! It’s a joy to see them doing their lady bird things. (Hmm….maybe that is not the way to say that…”lady bird things”…hmm. ???)
    Anyways, HA!
    Seriously, I find it difficult to choose one photo because they are all outstanding…but I like the sweet expression and body language of #10.
    Gotta’ say… #9 has attitude and I like that!
    And #8 is showing off her fabulous coat!
    (((HUGS))) and hope all is going well!

    Like

    1. Thank you, Carolyn. Yeah, it was difficult to choose, and yes, I’m doing OK-ish . . . trying to write the “X” story and not feeling it. Perry has his done, and Gary is scheduled to finish his later . . . I need to get cranking.

      Hope your weekend is nice (many parts are getting snow, so in case you’re in one of those places, happy snowshoeing!)

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Good luck on the “X” story…may your muse get into high gear!

        We had about 8 inches of snow last week. Then another snow storm was to hit yesterday, but we just ended up with a day of rain.

        Like

  4. Last time you posted humming birds I showed the images to my bird-loving Bride. Big mistake. Her adrenalin started pumping and she went on an internet shopping bonanza for humming bird craft stuff and humming bird jewellery…
    🤨

    Like

    1. Well, cheer up . . . these are Tree Swallows.

      Besides, as I look at your blog, I see a lot of specialized paraphernalia . . . what a bit of hummingbird jewelry in comparison?

      Like

Voice your opinion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑