“I” stories voting and May 23rd Photos — Part 3

“J” story writing looms in my near future even as the country seems to be coming apart at the seams and our Baby President acts like the dicktator of a banana republic (with the unquestioning support of Republicans and supporters who seemingly have no clue what the word “patriot” means).

Against that backdrop, I understand why our “I”-stories vote count is on the low side. Still, if you want a break from our current bizarro world, read the “I” stories submissions, and after, if motivated, vote for their favorite of the “Alphabet Challenge I-Stories” HERE<<<This is a link.

That post has links to the individual stories and the poll where readers can click a box to indicate their appreciation for their favorite. And, after voting, readers can spread the news about the story to friends and family. Maybe.

So, continuing with the May 23, 2020 photo adventures . . . after capturing a few birds in the backyard, we went for a drive to Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge<<<This is a link and grabbed a few photos of birds on fences and reeds (shared a few posts ago <<<This is a link).

Then, as I stopped to look at the scenery, I noticed a large bird flying toward us (we were inside the car).

I turned off the car and lowered the window and zoomed in . . . 

A Bald Eagle, it was, angling in toward us.

That photo is as it came out of the camera and is shot at 300mm zoom.

The eagle was on a heading to cross right in front of us, so I only got four photos before I had the windshield interfering with the shots. Quickly, I lowered the passenger window and leaned over trying to get it on that side.

Instead, it turned right in front of us and headed back out across the lake. This time, I got out of the car, but by the time I was able to bring the camera into action, it was about 300 yards away (as measured on Google Earth) and preparing to land on a tree.

At the time, I had no idea why he’d done a fly-by . . . but I figured it out later (keep reading).

Anyway, back to the above photo. These next two photos show what I can get if I crop the original (essentially, doing the equivalent of a digital zoom).

NOTE: as usual, you can click on the photo for a larger version.

Not very good, those.

The first crop is OK as long as you don’t mind imagining what it looks like as opposed to seeing it. The second crop shows what happens when you enlarge a photo beyond the limit of the data you have.

. . . but I have Topaz Labs GigaPixel AI (see the previous post) . . .

Here are the same two photos after I enlarged the original 2X.

The photos are output the same size as the previous two, but they are cropped from a larger image, and hence there’s more detail, especially in the second crop.

The size differential is evident in the SmugMug Gallery HERE <<<This is a link if viewing the actual size of the uncropped images.

From herein, unless labeled otherwise, all the photos are the “closer” crops of a 2X enlargement of the original processed using DxO Nik Collection Color Efex Pro 4 and Lightroom CC.

Granted, if you do look at the full-size version — or even click on the above — and you closely look at the boundary between the bird and the sky, you might notice slight anomalies, but for me, I prefer these to the originals.

Here, some might say I’m cheating. What can I say? We admire paintings that are no more than approximations of the originals. A stylized rendition of the original. Well, photographers — from fashion to landscape to portraits — present an idealized and highly manipulated version of reality. And them be the ones who get paid a lot . . . I’m doing this for free, so I’ll do whatever I can to present something in what I think is the best way.

This next shot is of the eagle approaching the tree it was aiming for. Because it’s a poor-quality photo, I’m offering up the monochrome version.

The dynamic contrast between the eagle in the sun and the shade of the background tree was substantial, and it shows.

The shots in this next photo gallery are a bit — but not all that much — better.

That’s when I noticed a second eagle flying, this one between 500 and 600 yards away . . .

Original as captured

2X enlargement plus processing – crop no. 1

2X enlargement plus processing – crop no. 2

This next photo is close to a 1:1 crop of an original without any processing.

crop of an original photo — this is about as large as I can make it by cropping without enlarging

It’s a pretty decent photo (meaning, decent resolution) so I can play with it in Lightroom and improve it a bit (had to crop a bit less) . . .

Honestly, that’s pretty good. For comparison, here’s the version after enlarging the original 2X.

They look the same size because that’s how I output them, but the second one is much larger (click HERE <<<This is a Link for full-size version, then again to zoom in and out).

Here are two more photos from that series (they look the same but they are two different photos) . . .

That same bird made a sweeping turn and I took this shot . . .

At this point, I’m guessing 600+ yards because it eventually dropped below the treeline and the front of those trees are about 550 yards away.

This is a 1:1 crop of the eagle on the next photo in the series . . . 

Using the same process, here are two different crops of the 2X photo with that eagle . . .

It looks OK at 2X enlargement and presented at that size, but if I try to zoom/enlarge twice as much, we get this a bit of a mess. Here are a few versions at 4X enlargement processed slightly differently trying to get details to show . . .

Realistically, either one of these two crops are sufficient and hit the spot for resolution versus size (in my opinion).

The second shot is beginning to show artifacts from the enlargement. Those artifacts are clearly visible in the 4X enlargements in the previous gallery.

I went back to the first eagle . . . and missed when he took off . . .

I processed the first on in B&W because it shows a bit more detail . . .

. . . honest, some of these are OK but nothing beats either being closer or having a big-ass lens.

“Ain’t you got a P900?”

Well, yeah, but that’s not super-great at maximum zoom in the shade.

I like this photo for the visible eye between the leaves . . . but I messed it up because I had the camera on Auto, so it did its own processing and I think it’s too much.

Contrast the above with this shot where my in-camera processing settings are all set at a minimum.

As I said many times . . . what you gain in zoom, you lose in quality. The P900 is still a great walk-around camera held back by the small sensor. And, really, that’s probably better than the D7500 with a cheap kit lens (which is what I was using).

Anyway, remember I said I couldn’t figure out why the eagle had come our way and then went back? I think it’s because there was a dead fish on the road . . . and I was so intent on the eagle that I missed the vulture that had landed and was feasting on it.  . . .

This is a gallery of stills extracted from the video I took with the P900 (the D7500 was inside the car) and I was lucky to get these because I had a heck of a time focusing and shooting the video.

Here’s the video but it’s not worth watching because it jumps around a lot. I’m only including it for fans of Cloverfield.

It’s a crappy video because it caught me by surprise. It was windy and I had the P900 at max zoom in bright sun, so I had a hard time focusing . . . and when I moved, the bird took off.

I put these in the usual SmugMug Gallery (HERE <<<This is a Link) but you don’t get that much more (quality) than what’s here (only larger). I’m hoping someday to be a lot closer to one of these birds and get better photos.

Here’s a gallery of select photos to wrap-up this post.

That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.

<><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><>

Note: if you are not reading this blog post at DisperserTracks.com, know that it’s copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intentions, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.

<><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><>

If you’re new to this blog, it might be a good idea to read the FAQ page. If you’re considering subscribing to this blog, it’s definitively a good idea to read both the About page and the FAQ page.

About disperser

Odd guy with odd views living an odd life during odd times.
This entry was posted in Feathers, Nikon D7500, Nikon P900, Photography Stuff, Photos and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to “I” stories voting and May 23rd Photos — Part 3

  1. mvschulze says:

    Nice review. Oh, and I liked Cloverfield, especially living near NYC! With all the jittering, I thought it was real! …well, almost! If I remember correctly, (which is not that often,) it was that last scene that got me! Like “There’s more to this story!” M :-)

    Like

  2. Ggreybeard says:

    I’d be proud if I took some of those shots. Much as I love imaging birds, they always look best when in flight and I usually make a mess of it.

    As for digital processing software, it is a legitimate aid to producing good quality images, as is the camera hardware itself.

    Like

    • disperser says:

      Thank you, Ggraybeard.

      Don’t get me wrong, I’m happy with those shots because the alternative is no shots or shots so small that are not worth sharing.

      Really, sharing these isn’t to say “look how great these are” or even “look how crappy these are” . . . it’s more to document me being happy about having seen the birds, and also sharing my approval of tools that let me salvage what would otherwise be marginal shots.

      Like

  3. oneowner says:

    The P900 does a fine job, even when pushed to its limits. I may consider a long zoom camera just for the ability to get a few decent bird shots. Nice work.

    Like

    • disperser says:

      I agree. The downside of the P900 long zoom is that it’s mainly for stationary objects. I’d never been able to focus on flying birds with the P900 even at lower zooms because the viewfinder is crap and it’s impossible to use the rear screen for dynamic focusing.

      The P1000 and P950 have better viewfinders, but I can’t justify the cost for the few times I’d use it.

      To be fair, even a DSLR long lens like the 80-400mm I own is difficult to focus on flying birds at maximum zoom, but I can do it because all the DSLRs I own give me a good and clear view from the viewfinder.

      So, yes, the handheld photo from the P900 at full zoom is better than the crop from the handheld D7500 at 300mm and that’s with minimal processing on the P900 capture and a lot of work on the cropped D7500 photo. It’s why I carry both camera when I head out to shoot birds.

      That said, I still want the 200-500mm Nikon specifically because I think the results from cropping a 750mm equivalent DSLR photo might give me higher quality than the P900 . . . or, I could buy a P1000 (but it’s such a large camera that it makes carrying two cameras a bit difficult).

      Good luck with your decision.

      Like

  4. Them be big impressive birds…and you’ve captured them beautifully!
    And you’re fortunate to have been in their presence.
    I’ve seen quite a few bald eagles, falcons, hawks, etc., in the wild. Very rarely a vulture.
    I’m always honored to see these big birds.
    HUGS!!!
    PS…I’ve seen a condor, but not close-up…a friend of mine saw one in the wild, in the mountains, VERY close up. She is less than 5 feet tall and very skinny. She was worried the condor might decide to carry her away.

    Liked by 1 person

    • disperser says:

      Thank you, Carolyn.

      Your friend didn’t have much to worry about unless she was (or mimicked) carion or was severely hurt and near death as condors are carion eaters. Even then they probably have a maximum lift capacity about equal to their own weight, or somewhere around 30 lbs. max . . . she would have to be VERY skinny to worry. Plus, they don’t have talons like other raptors that can grasp (kill) and carry their prey.

      Overall, she should have been in awe of being that close and not all that worried about becoming a meal.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. AnnMarie says:

    I looked at this post on the day it appeared and got so excited by the eagle photos, and me screen clipping one of them (which I’ve already seen several times taking up all my screen!), that I forgot to comment! I think that says enough.

    Liked by 1 person

Voice your opinion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.