Don’t panic . . . but be informed, part two.

I’ve been doing something I rarely do. I’ve been sending out group emails.

“About what?” you ask.

What else? . . . COVID-19.

I wrote some stuff about the virus in Part One, but that was a while ago and the situation is about as dynamic as they come.  Now, I say “a while ago” and these days — the two weeks between the last post about COVID-19 and today’s offering — seem more like two months, if not years.

Despite most people — most sensible people — self-isolating and having lots of time on their hands, I don’t want to make this a super-long read because I’m linking to articles and sites that are far more important than what I have to say.

However, I want to reiterate what I said before. Namely, I’m not in a panic and you should work at also not being in a panic. Concerned, yes.

I am concerned, but for broader reasons than just the infection and mortality rate. We’re looking at yet again the world undergoing a profound change, and doing so rather quickly regardless of how this thing plays out. I can’t point to many quick changes that resulted in betterment of people’s lives.

Because of it, I’m concerned about COVID-19, the under and over-reaction of people and politicians, the economic impact, geopolitical pressures, fiscal policies, and the fact that under stress and difficult periods, even well-meaning people react in ways that have profound negative repercussions long after the threat is gone or managed.

We’ll see how this plays out, but we already don’t recognize the world we live in. The good thing is that we’re getting a more realistic — and stark — view of how things work. The bad thing is that people are going to freak out. The worst thing is that politicians seldom let a good crisis go to waste.

That said, there’s a quote I rather like and keep in mind:


– Michael Leavitt

Anyway, here are some of the things that I’ve been sending out to my limited email distribution. Much of what I link is not suited to scanning or a quick read. If that’s your mindset and preference, move on to some cat video or something because there are no jokes, levity, or anything other than my COVID-19 references:

Charts: there are three sites I use for following the changing numbers:

The John Hopkins tracking of global cases. This site is useful for quick views.

These next two sites (for me) have much more information with regards to the threat and trends. For each, I’m going to post the global, the US, and the Italy link; clicking on any one of those will get you access to the other two as well as data for any country of interest.

First site:

Second site:

All the maps track the same things with minor differences. They may also be slightly different depending on when they update. Two things worry me when I look at those maps. Take, for instance, Italy, and specifically this graphic:

The ratio for closed cases has me concerned. Here’s a similar graph from the other chart, this one for the US.

Unless I’m misreading the chart, of the people who have gone through it, we’re zeroing in on 50%. That, by the way, is very similar to Italy’s graph.

What we want to approach or aim for is the latter part of the graph for China.

China’s final (for now) death rate hovers around 4% with the majority of cases resolved.

I can draw my own assumptions about what the graphs mean, and so should readers.

For a while, I was running my own spreadsheets and working out various ratios and trends. For instance, our current infection growth follows pretty closely a curve you get when you begin with one person and an infection rate of around 1.34, meaning, each person infects 1.34 other people.

It doesn’t sound like much but remember two things: that rate gives us 487,000 infected by March 31, and 9 million by April 10. Also, we’re late in starting to test; we likely have a higher infection rate than that.

You can then back-calculate other numbers using data from other countries and the numbers are not good . . . as in, more than 400-thousand-dead not good.

Information: However, at this point, much depends on the steps we take. These two articles — not light reading — do a good job of explaining what we are facing and especially the importance of what has been dubbed “social distancing”. They are at the site Medium.

From March 10th: HERE
From March 19th: HERE

Those are opinions backed up by some existing data (similar to what I was trying to do in my spreadsheet but with a lot more skill and information). If you rather keep to official channels, the CDC’s site on the pandemic is:

Also, the New England Journal of Medicine has opened up its COVID-19 content so that you don’t need a subscription.

For them who want a math refresher and how it applies to the virus . . .

If you want to see what the front line looks like in Italy, this is a stark and depressing (and scary) look:
. . . and if you want the human aspect of that . . .

Sam Harris has done two informative interviews with two different experts:
They are a little over an hour each, and if you’re only going to listen to one, I strongly suggest listening to the second one.

OK, I’m throwing up links I’ve found useful, and while I realize there’s a lot here to digest, notice I’ve refrained from politics and sensationalism and calling out stupid young people and stupid old people (later, I promise) or dangers from our elected officials on both sides of the aisle because they are never hesitant to take advantage of any crisis that comes along. I’ll try to cover that in another post because that is also a big concern of mine. Look at what happened after 9/11 — and continues to this day.

Anyway, stay safe, keep away from other people (other than your family who, I presume, are not infected), minimize going out, don’t hoard, and most of all, stay informed so that you don’t fall for stupid and possibly dangerous advice.

Lastly, mind your mental health, emotions, etc. By that, I mean be aware of changes in behavior and heightened stress and take steps to minimize the effects of continued stress (one of the articles below covers that aspect).

If people stop being stupid (a big IF), and if they take this seriously, we could “flatten the curve” in the next few weeks and get back to a new normal that — not optimal — will be manageable. If we don’t, the new normal will be . . . well, I think “awful” is a strong enough word.

VIDEOS about making masks and an article on the best MATERIALS for masks.

An ARTICLE from the UK’s Imperial College on the best approach to combatting the pandemic.

That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.


Note: if you are not reading this blog post at, know that it’s copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intentions, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.


If you’re new to this blog, it might be a good idea to read the FAQ page. If you’re considering subscribing to this blog, it’s definitively a good idea to read both the About page and the FAQ page.