Hey! “Sunday With My Thoughts” back for a limited appearence

“Don’t be a dick” was the topic of Phil Plait’s speech at TAM 8. You can watch the video but, basically, Plait argued for moderation in discussions. He was addressing skeptics and atheists and specifically their interaction with the religious and believers in “woo”.

As might be expected, the response was mixed. Some people accused him of being an accommodationist and others applauded his call for measured and civil interactions.  

At the time — eight years or so ago — my reaction was . . . well, defensive. 

Mind you, I found a lot of counterarguments and rebuttals in support of my defensiveness but the reality was inescapable: I had to examine why I was so defensive. 

I reviewed my past discussions and interactions with people and examined how I approached discussions about religion and magic and UFOs and any topic I considered anchored in ignorance and willful disregard of science and reason. 

The conclusion was uncomfortable to admit . . . not a majority of the time but enough times to be significant, I was a dick. Needlessly confrontational and prone to badgering would be another way to say I was a dick.

Since then, whenever I’m in discussions, I’ve been peripherally aware of my propensity for being a dick and have made efforts to limit my dickiness . . . dickness? . . . limit me behaving like a dick. 

Have I succeeded?

I think so. I hope so. But, it’s an ongoing process and it’s easy to slip up.

Mind you, I can still purposely be a dick, especially once past the point where I lose respect for the person I’m interacting with. Once respect is lost, my civility quotient drops significantly. It’s not something I’m proud of per se, but I’m at least aware of it and deliberate in my actions; when I choose to be a dick, I think I’m pretty good at it. I had years of practice, after all. 

But, that’s not the purpose — and never was the purpose — when engaging others in discussions about shared interests and concerns (especially when I’m at odds with the other person’s views).

No; the purpose is to learn more about why others believe differently and also to at least make the other person understand my position.

That one or both of us change our minds and come to a better understanding of each other and of the topic of discussion is the main — and desired — goal and there have been a few instances when my views changed as a result of fruitful discussions. 

Why is it important for there to be civil and reasoned discussion?

Because such a discussion will plant a seed. A confrontation often does nothing but entrench the other individual in their views; you can literally watch them build barricades around their ideas and close them off to outside challenges. 

But, how does one know when one is being a dick?

Usually, you get hints. Ignoring those hints and doubling down just makes you a bigger dick. The best indicator is when someone tells you you’re being a dick and explains how you’re being a dick. 

Some dicks will, of course, argue they’re not being dicks; I know because I used to similarly argue.

How can I be a dick when I’m right!?!

What I used to confuse — and what dicks still confuse — is the difference between the validity of one’s argument and one’s behavior when making that argument.

When Phil spoke about not being a dick he didn’t mean don’t stand your ground; he didn’t mean don’t defend science and facts and rational thinking; he didn’t attack one’s duty to challenge all manners or irrational, odious, and otherwise harmful thinking. 

Nope; he just argued that while doing all that, you shouldn’t be a dick about it. 

It’s a tough thing to accept . . . that one might be or had been a dick. 

I still think back at instances I wish I could erase the memory of my behavior both from my mind and the mind of others. I still think about missed opportunities to possibly — albeit marginally — help improve the world but for my ego-driven propensity to be a dick. 

Whether or not you think you’re being a dick, the Internet has a long memory . . . knowingly or unknowingly be a dick once, and it will be out there for all to see for a long, long time.

I’m wiser now, and while that doesn’t change or undo any damage I might have done, I can at least moderate my behavior going forward.

There may yet be times when my ability and talent to be a dick is called for, but I’m as careful with it as I am when I carry a gun; it’s a tool of last recourse. 

That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.

<><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><>

Note: if you are not reading this blog post at DisperserTracks.com, know that it has been copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intention, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.

<><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><>

If you’re new to this blog, it might be a good idea to read the FAQ page. If you’re considering subscribing to this blog, it’s definitively a good idea to read both the About page and the FAQ page.

About disperser

Odd guy with odd views living an odd life during odd times.
This entry was posted in Opinions and Stuff, Skepticism and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Hey! “Sunday With My Thoughts” back for a limited appearence

  1. mvschulze says:

    I’m familiar with Phil Plait from his debunking of pseudo science, particularly astronomy; and James “amazing” Randi, ( his $1m challenge to show proof of basically the un-provable, often an interesting conversation subject,) which leads me to think being a “Dick” …is excusable in those cases where what might be considered a rational stance does not convince or even MOVE an adversary – leading to frustration and then… dickishness! Thanks for the Sunday Thoughts, and links. M :-)

    Like

  2. Thanks for the link! I’ll check it out!
    We live and learn.
    But sometimes a situation or a conversation calls for a dick…
    well, somehow my comment is not going where it should have…in my mind I’m off your original subject now…so I’ll just go.
    HUGS!!!

    Like

  3. Emily Scott says:

    It’s not easy to admit when you’ve been a dick.. I look back at some of my past behaviour and cringe for sure. Here’s to listening to each other… and trying to have a genuine, unconfrontational discussion. Non-dickishness is the aim!

    Like

  4. As we get older it is harder to be convinced to change our views and it becomes something to really work on. As I get older it becomes increasingly difficult for me to believe that man has ever landed on the moon.

    Like

    • disperser says:

      That’s an easy one compared to most of the stuff people believe in.

      Also, to help you believe, you can get punched by one of the people who went there.

      The interesting thing: only twelve people ever walked on the Moon (to date) and there’s a strange correlation there to the 12 Apostles. People will believe all sorts of things from one group of 12 while doubting one thing from another group of 12 . . . and they have tons more evidence and redundant proof.

      Like

Voice your opinion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.