National Museum of Naval Aviation — Part 1

I have 386 photos to share and while I toyed with the idea of doing it all in one lo-o-ong post, I’ll instead break it up into multiple posts. 

These are the pared-down versions of over 800 photos I shot over the course of two visits to the National Museum of Naval Aviation in Pensacola, Florida. The photos are from 2014 and that gives you an idea of just how lazy I can be when processing photos. Fair warning: I’m presenting the planes as displayed four years ago. There might have been additions to the collection, some might have been moved, and some removed to make room for other planes.

Naval Aviation Museum — F-14A Tomcat

Before we get started, a bit of information. I’ll be posting my own photos but — whenever possible — the photo caption will have a link to the Museum’s own description for the plane in question. Also whenever possible, I’ll include an additional link. For instance, for the above plane, I’m including a link to the Wikipedia page for the Grumman F-14 Tomcat.

There are many other links I could have picked but I’ll leave it to the reader to hunt them down (do a Google search). Hint: I’ll often pick the Wikipedia entry because they typically have many links included as references for their articles. 

Yes, it’s just as expedient — if so inclined — going to the Museum’s own website and browsing their collection. This post is mostly for me since I went to the trouble of taking and processing the photos. 

Once I link the information for a plane, if I happen to show it again (some planes are photographed at different angles), I won’t include a link. I’ll also won’t duplicate information from the links unless of interest to me. In previous airplane posts, I copied descriptions and pasted them in the post.  I figure anyone interested can just click on the links and read whatever interests them. 

One last comment before we start; all of the photos have been processed using the Nik Collection by DxO modules. The first day I shot hand-held and with a high ISO (1600 to 3200 and occasionally higher). That combined with the indoor lighting made the photos pretty grainy . . . it’s thus a testament to the tools I used that they turned out as well as they did.

OK, here we go . . . No, wait; as usual, click on any photo for a larger version to open in a new tab or window. There will be a gallery at the end of the post.

Here’s another shot of the Tomcat mounted on the pedestal in front of the museum.

Naval Aviation Museum — F-14A Tomcat

The museum is free to visit and it’s only closed a few times a year. If you happen to visit when the Blue Angels are practicing . . . well, you better get there early. Even when we went, the parking lot was nearly full by the time we got there. 

The entrance is nice and airy and sports a sculpture entitled The Spirit of Naval Aviation.

Naval Aviation Museum — The Spirit of Naval Aviation

The entrance sports a few aircraft and a number of Aircraft Carrier models.

Naval Aviation Museum — AH-1 SeaCobra

The Wiki entry gives a bit more history for the Bell AH-1 SuperCobra/SeaCobra platform.

Naval Aviation Museum
Naval Aviation Museum
Naval Aviation Museum
Naval Aviation Museum

These next planes were a bother to identify because I didn’t bother to photograph the signs for them . . . something I did for all subsequent planes. 

National Naval Aviation Museum

The red plane hanging on the wall is a Douglas D558-1 Skystreak and here’s the Wiki entry for it.

The jet behind the pillar is a Grumman F9F-2 Panther and here’s the Wiki entry for it. 

The plane in the foreground is listed as an FM-2 Wildcat which is a variant of the Grumman F4F Wildcat

All of these photos were “easy” as there was lots of available ambient light. Not so for the rest of the photos. 

National Naval Aviation Museum — PB2Y Coronado
National Naval Aviation Museum — PB2Y Coronado

In case it’s not obvious, that is a big plane. The Navy wanted a larger version of the PBY Catalina . . . this is it. Read the Wiki entry here. I’ll have other views — including a panorama — of this plane. 

Literally in the shadow of the Coronado’s wing sits a Grumman F7F Tigercat

National Naval Aviation Museum — F7F Tigercat
National Naval Aviation Museum — F7F Tigercat
National Naval Aviation Museum — F7F Tigercat

I think it’s an elegant plane, especially comparing it to some of the workhorses from that era.

National Naval Aviation Museum — F8F Bearcat
National Naval Aviation Museum

The Grumman F8F Bearcat might not have seen much WW II combat but it was popular in the racing circuit. 

The Grumman TBF Avenger (designated TBM when manufactured by GM) 

National Naval Aviation Museum — TBF/TBM Avenger
National Naval Aviation Museum
National Naval Aviation Museum— TBF/TBM Avenger

I’ve always liked the looks of the Vought F4U Corsair’s gull-wings and it’s interesting reading the only reason for the feature was to allow ground clearance for the propeller without making the landing gear struts too long. 

This version is designated FG-1D Corsair and built by Goodyear. I like the nickname “Whistling Death”.

National Naval Aviation Museum — FG-1D Corsair
National Naval Aviation Museum
National Naval Aviation Museum — FG-1D Corsair
National Naval Aviation Museum — FG-1D Corsair

The plane hanging above the Corsair is a Brewster SB2A Buccaneer. There will be another link to it later on when I show a better photo.

Another aircraft that gave me the runaround as far as identification goes is the Grumman J2F Duck. Here it is, just hanging around all casual-like. 

National Naval Aviation Museum — J2F Duck

Next up is a plane that is different in the Museum’s listing than the photo I took in 2014.

National Naval Aviation Museum — F6F-3 Hellcat
National Naval Aviation Museum — F6F-3 Hellcat

The photo in the Museum’s listing is for a plane that carries the number 17 and has an underside external tank. It could be they repainted this one or swapped it out for a different version of the same plane. The Wikipedia entry for the Grumman F6F Hellcat does list the museum as having two of these planes. The (-3) classification indicates it was used by the British. 

National Naval Aviation Museum — F6F-3 Hellcat

And now, a change of pace . . . something that is neither a boat or a plane but is nonetheless a vehicle that served in the Navy.

National Naval Aviation Museum — 1940 Plymouth (P11)
National Naval Aviation Museum — 1940 Plymouth Navy Staff Car (P11)

It might not be immediately obvious to readers, but that car had a “suicide door” that if left ajar could swing open and pull the passenger out. Meaning the door opened front-to-back. As this was primarily used as a Staff Car for high-ranking officers, we can assume said officers might not have been well-regarded.

National Naval Aviation Museum

Plymouth in the 1940s became the third most popular car brand (almost surpassing Ford) mostly on the strength of it being cheap.

Notice the mention of the paint color . . . something I could not get quite right because the car is in a poorly-lit area and thus suffers from reflected light making it appear different in color. 

National Naval Aviation Museum— 1940 Plymouth Navy Staff Car (P11)

All of the above shots are with me using the on-camera flash and that gives it a slight blue tinge I couldn’t quite correct without messing the colors for the surroundings (also, I didn’t want to mess with it too much).

Here are the shots without the flash . . . 

National Naval Aviation Museum— 1940 Plymouth Navy Staff Car (P11)
National Naval Aviation Museum— 1940 Plymouth Navy Staff Car (P11)

That’s closer to the actual color of the car but I had to really lighten the scene so that’s probably also a bit off. 

Another quick note . . . these photos are grouped no so much by subject but roughly in chronological order. A couple might be reversed because I prefer showing one orientation before the other but overall these are sequential. 

Here’s a shot of three of the planes I mentioned above; The F6F Hellcat, the J2F Duck, and the SB2A Buccaneer.

National Naval Aviation Museum — F6F-3 Hellcat, SB2A Buccaneer, J2F Duck

That’s George and Fred discussing the merits of Metamucil versus just eating lots of oatmeal to get the required amount of daily fiber.  

I’m kidding and probably being a bit mean as those are likely two pilots discussing the merits of those planes. They are too young to have flown them during the time the planes were in service of the Navy but they might have piloted more modern planes. 

Next up, we have a Douglas SBD-3 Dauntless and a pretty famous one at that:

National Naval Aviation Museum — SBD Dauntless BuNo 2106

That’s a veteran . . . the plane, not the man. I mean, the man is also likely a veteran, but that particular plane is a Pearl Harbor survivor. Click on the link for a more detailed history. Other info HERE and HERE.

Here’s the plaque at the Museum:

National Naval Aviation Museum

The Museum website has a Sunken Treasures display (HERE and HERE) that was either not there when I visited or I completely missed. 

I’ll end this post with two more photos of BuNo 2106 and call it a day. 

National Naval Aviation Museum — SBD-3 Dauntless BuNo 2106
National Naval Aviation Museum — SBD-3 Dauntless BuNo 2106

Here’s the gallery of the above photos. To see the photos in their original size or presented a bit better, please visit the associated SmugMug Gallery HERE.

That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.

<><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><>

Note: if you are not reading this blog post at DisperserTracks.com, know that it has been copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intention, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.

<><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><>

If you’re new to this blog, it might be a good idea to read the FAQ page. If you’re consider ing subscribing to this blog, it’s definitively a good idea to read both the About page and the FAQ page.

19 thoughts on “National Museum of Naval Aviation — Part 1

Add yours

  1. Love it! Great post; you excelled yourself for once.
    The machine guns in the last photo look look the Browning’s I learned to strip, put together, and fire, when I was in the Army back in 1953, (when you were probably in nappies/diapers, or whatever they called them, in Serbia, where ever;)
    They are probably the ·50 calibre; whereas ground troops had ·303’s, I think it was, long time ago; but they look identical.
    The wings of the FG1D Corsair look like the for runners to todays A380 Airbus, The gull wing.

    Like

    1. The Dauntless is listed as having forward-firing .50 caliber fixed and rear flexible AN/M2 .30 caliber.

      And yes, I was probably either in gestation or just a few months old in 1953.

      I’m not sure I would call that shape a forerunner in the sense that it’s a derivative of it. The A380’s wings have a reverse curve to the Corsair and also at a fairly constant curvature. The Corsair has a fairly dramatic change in angle from the fuselage through the bottom of the wing and then back up.

      If you like this post, you should check out all my other airplane museum offerings:

      Smithsonian: https://dispersertracks.com/?s=Udvar-hazy

      Boeing Museum of Flight: https://dispersertracks.com/tag/boeing-museum-of-flight/

      Air Zoo: https://dispersertracks.com/2012/02/07/the-air-zoo-of-kalamazoo-2004-snapshot/

      Weisbrod: https://dispersertracks.com/2011/07/03/pueblos-weisbrod-air-museum/

      Like

  2. I love seeing these planes, aircraft carriers, the car, etc!!! Wow! What a great place to spend a few days looking around! Yes, it might take me days to take it all in!

    I love planes, trains, and automobiles!

    OOH! I’d love to go up in the SeaCobra and the Duck!!!

    Thanks for sharing these, Emilio!
    HUGS!!! 🙂

    Like

    1. I’ve yet to visit an aeroplane museum I didn’t like.

      As for going up . . . only if I have live missiles and plenty of ammunition.

      You are welcome and Thank you, Carolyn.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I think it’s a good idea to break up all the photos into various posts. People tend to rush when any post is too long, and it would be a sin to rush through these!!!

    Like

      1. I think the comment is in response to my decision not to show all 300+ photos in one post. That would be a tad much even for me.

        I think I never go over 100 photos in one post.

        Still, the decision was more due to time constraints than worry about people losing interest. It takes time to compose these . . . and, I’m still not done . . .

        Thanks for the comment.

        Like

        1. Thank you for having taken the time to reply. I have read your FAQ page so I know you don’t reply as much as you would like. You don’t have to reply to my comment. Have a nice day.

          Like

        2. Hmm . . . I’ll have to review the FAQ; I don’t think I mention not replying. As I said, I respond to pretty much all comments.

          I perused your blog and will take a closer look (currently traveling and doing touristy stuff). The translate function is a little iffy Sometimes it says it can’t translate a page) but it mostly does OK.

          Like

    1. Thank you. I’ve been remiss in finishing the series but will get back to it soon.

      Don’t you love the word “soon”? It could be tomorrow or months from now.

      Like

      1. You know that replying to my comment might become addictive. I love you sense of humor. As a footnote… I love cats. Had five. Three died one year apart, 2015, 2016, 2017. They were sisters. The ones that are left are 18 years-old and 9. Hard to lose a cat.

        Like

      2. With rare exceptions, I reply to comments. If it’s someone I know well (family) I might reply privately.

        I don’t acknowledge “likes” because that would be too much.

        We had a total of four cats. Enjoyed them all but it was difficult losing them. Not sure we’ll have another pet.

        Kitty was the last cat to share our lives:

        Miss Kitty: June 1991 – September 2011

        As for my sense of humor . . . anyone who likes my sense of humor has to, perforce, have a similar sense of humor. So, congratulations to both of us, then.

        Like

Voice your opinion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑