Project 313 – Post No. 073

A few posts ago, I mentioned Wabi-Sabi and how tourists value “hand-made” trinkets over mass-manufactured trinkets. But, how does one know if something is man-made by a true artisan of the culture or man-made by cheap labor in a third world country?

Some of the hand-sewn Hawaiʻian quilts one can find in local shops are hand-sewn but imported from elsewhere. Plus, sewing machines can now be programmed to produce irregular stitches making it seem as if the product was hand-sewn. 

Soon — if not already — automation will be good enough to mimic the imperfections of humans. In fact, AI-driven machines may surpass human ability to make something look like it was made by a human. 

It’s a bit ironic, don’t you think? If some artisan slaves away at making something and by sheer determination and skill manages to produce a flawless product, people might think it was mass-produced. Clams face the same issue when making pearls. 

I just read somewhere that artificial diamonds are now better at being diamonds than actual diamonds. 

I mention all this because we’re entering a time when the way we value things — anything from human labor to products to services — is likely to be up-ended by “smart” machines.  

There are two camps when it comes to talking about the coming (if not already here) AI revolution.

One camp maintains AIs — like other technological innovations in the past — will create jobs, not take them away. 

The other camp maintains that this is truly different; AI and AI driven machines will replace most jobs. 

Let’s look at two examples at opposite ends of the technological spectrum.

First, self-driving trucks. About four million men hold jobs involving some sort of driving. They will all be eventually replaced. The support infrastructure (processing, planning, loading, unloading, scheduling) will also suffer a large reduction if not outright replacement. Some people maintain this will create jobs but what kind of jobs? A typical 40+ truck driver with a High School diploma is not all of a sudden morph into a computer tech. Per everything I see coming down the line, those people will be out of their jobs and the only replacement jobs are likely to be lower paying and subject to increased competition thus ensuring the pay will remain low. They will, in fact, overlap the generation of truckers that would have eventually replaced them . . . and now have no jobs waiting for them. 

Second, let’s look at a radiologist . . . they spent a lot of money for school and earn a high salary . . . but there are already AI-driven computers that are more accurate in reading and diagnosing diseases by “looking” at x-rays. That’s because machines can differentiate many more shades of gray and colors than the human eye. In short order, patients will prefer/demand computers as opposed to humans reading their scans. Poof! A high-paying job out the window. What does this unemployed radiologist all of a sudden do? They’re highly specialized in a field that no longer needs them. 

I heard a good discussion of all this and one statement, for me, characterized the difference. The internal combustion engine was a great innovation but it is a machine. It was a tool used by people. AIs are not tools for humans . . . they are replacements for humans. Not only that, they can replace humans from the most menial and repetitive tasks to very sophisticated and complex operations. 

Some will argue that AI make mistakes . . . yes, and so do humans. Besides, AIs are already more reliable than humans. Automated manufacturing already produces higher quality products than those made by traditional workers on an assembly line. 

Other advantages AIs have . . .

They have immediate access to all prior knowledge, mistakes, successes, and can “learn” from all that data a lot faster than humans. Whereas a human needs training, an AI just needs a data portal. If I own a company, I know a human worker will take some amount of time before they can become proficient at their job, before they learn all the pitfalls, before they encounter all the obstacles that need surmounting to gain experience. An AI has all that a few seconds after it’s plugged in. If I need to make a change in the process, it means weeks of training human workers. It means an upgrade and reboot of automated machines.

Whereas the knowledge a human learns is difficult to share (apprenticeships take time) and is subject to an incomplete transfer, AIs can instantly share knowledge even with AIs in other parts of the world. There are no pay-grade tasks nor hierarchy of knowledge. Pick any of your AIs and they will all be as reliable and knowledgeable. 

Some say we are ten to twenty years away from AIs exploding into the work environment and because humans have a difficult time thinking much further than a few years, it doesn’t seem like an immediate problem.  Politicians think in terms of re-election cycles, so either two or four years.

Do you remember ten years ago? Doesn’t it seem like it was only a few years ago? Yup. Nothing to worry about.

And now, the photo:

Project 313 073

Some of these logos are easily discernable . . . others won’t be. Some people won’t like these treatments . . . others will. 

The cartoon reminds me of something I used to face in photography . . . I used to have a yard full of flowers. No, wait . . . I used to have flowerbeds full of flowers. Anyone who used to follow me back in the day knows I snapped many photos of flowers (for example).

I don’t recall ever clipping (picking) a flower and taking it inside to better control the picture-capturing process. Mind you, I’ve photographed picked flowers but they were bought by me (or others) as opposed to picked by me. An important distinction. 

Wait . . . I stand corrected. One instance of me picking something to photograph (HERE) although technically that’s not a flower. In my defense, I would have plucked that seed ball anyway and disposed of the seeds. 

Speaking of AIs, I wonder how they would see themselves . . . would they even take selfies? Paint pictures of themselves? I presume so if their consciousness is comprised of something resembling the ego. This is what a Computer Self-Portrait might look like. I think. Maybe. I guess we’ll have to wait and see. 

Computer Self-Portrait


And . . . that’s it

Some of these posts will likely be longer as the mood hits me, but most will be thus; short, uninteresting, bland, and relentless.

You can read about Project 313 HERE.

That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.


Note: if you are not reading this blog post at, know that it has been copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intention, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.


Please, if you are considering bestowing me recognition beyond commenting below, refrain from doing so.  I will decline blogger-to-blogger awards.   I appreciate the intent behind it, but I prefer a comment thanking me for turning you away from a life of crime, religion, or making you a better person in some other way.  That would mean something to me.

If you wish to know more, please read below.

About awards: Blogger Awards
About “likes”:   Of “Likes”, Subscriptions, and Stuff

Note: to those who may click on “like”, or rate the post; if you do not hear from me, know that I am sincerely appreciative, and I thank you for noticing what I do.

. . .  my FP ward  . . . chieken shit.

Finally, if you interpret anything on this blog as me asking or wanting pity, sympathy, or complaining about my life, or asking for help and advice, know you’re likely missing my subtle mix of irony, sarcasm, and humor.

About disperser

Odd guy with odd views living an odd life during odd times.
This entry was posted in Project 313 and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Project 313 – Post No. 073

  1. Debbie says:

    For some reason the “looming” AI takeover doesn’t scare me. Might be because I am set to retire in 3 years.
    I’m remembering when everything was typed by hand on a typewriter, carbon paper etc but now easily done on a computer using Word. All those typists out of work? No they just learned how to navigate the computer.
    I realize that’s not on the same level with replacing a radiologist, but I have to admit I would like that AI’s opinion of my MRI/x ray over a person whose expertise I must trust even though I have no idea of their qualifications or work ethic.

    On a related topic – have you noticed the increase of stores to deliver groceries etc? I don’t mean via UPS but a person actually picks out your stuff and delivers it to your doorstep sometimes even the same day? (a new job category?) There is a charge that’s true – but for some people totally worth it. I haven’t tried it yet but I have tried the service where you order your groceries online and then stop by the store to pick them up. They charge about $5 which can be offset by coupons etc. I liked it but I got to thinking it was less exercise for me who needs all she can work into her life.
    I’m not afraid of changes that make life better. I think the economy will adapt.


    • disperser says:

      Not the same . . . for one, you’re still talking actual typing. For another, what happened was that many professionals started doing their own typing because the tool got easier.

      If you want to read/hear both sides of the debate, and at this point, it is a debate, there’s lots of information available. Plus, the transition always means jobs are lost. Unemployment is supposedly low, but check the numbers of people actually out of the workplace and especially pay attention to the age groups.

      One quick example exposing the possible absurdity of job replacement . . . during the last meltdown, many people lost their office job. Do you remember the shovel-ready jobs that were promised in construction and infrastructure rebuilding? How many office workers do you think could transition into doing construction jobs? Do you see a middle-management executive transitioning into climbing windmills to do maintenance on the motors?
      Even if they could, rarely have high-paying jobs been replaced by higher-paying jobs.

      I’m not optimistic and one of my worries is an even more populist-driven movement in social and political circles. Will we get through it? As a country, eventually, yes. As individuals right now and in the next twenty years . . . there will be some mighty rough patches and I don’t think we’re prepared for them.


  2. Debbie says:

    My boyfriend/husband’s first car was a worn out ’61 Ford Falcon with the headliner torn out. I think he paid $125 for it. I was the only one with a full time job I was always donating to it’s repair.
    His second car (still a boyfriend) was a 60-something GTO with everything. He bought it from a friend who found it not to be his style. I learned how to drive a stick in that car – at night on service roads, it was like floating on air that car. Three carburetors or something like that. I remember they were chrome plated. He also put in a 4-track then 8-track tape player and I have a specific memory of stopping somewhere and picking up a Led Zeppelin – the one with Whole Lotta’ Love. Of course I was often the one paying for things back then. The responsible party. Still, I loved that car and time of life.


    • disperser says:

      There you go . . . it sounds like you have a potential hobby after you retire; restoring a GTO. I think you can still find 8-track players.

      As for loving that time, I think people relate to it more in terms of they were young and with the whole future ahead of them when it seemed anything was possible. Those times were not particularly good in many aspects. But, being young trumps almost anything and that’s the part most people remember.

      . . . that too has changed . . .

      Liked by 1 person

  3. PHOTO: The GTO looks fiery! Love the colors!
    CARTOON: I love flowers, but never really enjoyed getting flowers from florists. I’d rather be given a flowering plant or bush to plant in my yard.
    DOODLE: Cool! It reminds me a little bit of cross stitching!
    HUGS!!! :-)


  4. I watched a TV programme (last year I think) when someone found a lost Roman city using satellite technology. I felt so sorry for the archaeologist who had spent half of his life searching for it using traditional methods, The look on his face was so sad!


  5. macquie says:

    Nice imaginative selfie art!


  6. AnnMarie says:

    Love those earthy paint colors!

    Liked by 1 person

Voice your opinion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.