Book Review – Closure: Jack Randall #1 by Randall Wood

This is my third book review and it’s a murder mystery tale. Well, I don’t know what it is, exactly. Perhaps it’s mystery-suspense but it does have murders in it. The main hero is an FBI agent and the plot is pretty good as is the writing. 

I had previously said I would go in reverse order to my reading, but some of these books end up blending into each other and I don’t remember exactly the order that I read them. 

Also, I’ve had two not-so-flattering reviews and figured I should do a review of a book I liked and that kept me interested. 

This is another self-published book (one of a series) except that this book was done right. Well written, good editing, tight plot and engaging characters. Randall Wood came up with a decent premise that he executed — in my opinion — pretty well. 

The plot takes a careful trip down the exploration of vigilante justice by someone with little to lose. Jack Randall, the titular character, is an engaging character even if introduced as a bit larger than life. The secondary character is the killer and he, for me, was the more engaging character. I would almost call him the hero of the story and — except for a few scenes where the hero mask is allowed to slip a bit — that carries through to the end. 

I can’t speak to the inner workings of the FBI and if they are accurately presented but given their many faltering steps in the real world, they’re here presented in a pretty good light. 

There are, occasionally, a few too many details for my liking but they are not super-annoying and they do lend credence to the action scenes. 

I also like that the personal lives of the protagonists were hinted at but not explored. Especially, the author resisted the common trap of the male-female professional relationship devolving into anything more. That said, he also laid the groundwork for that relationship to potentially drift into the personal in future books but I hope they don’t. I don’t know and at this point, I don’t care as this is the only book I’ve read. 

Lest people gag over what they might consider effusive praise, there are some things that I didn’t particularly like. The killer (and hero) of the story starts out as ultra careful and methodical but becomes less so in short order, thus allowing for the FBI to catch some breaks and zero in on the culprit. There was also a hint of the killer’s motives being personal but by the end of the book it seemed a more sweeping and nobler reason for his actions, namely, the revamping of the US criminal justice system. Yeah, good luck with that. 

I mean, the book touches on what I think is evident to every person living in America; if you have money you can get away with almost anything. Meaning, while it’s a system, justice plays a small role in the workings of it. 

But, back to the annoyances . . . some of the breaks they (the FBI) catch are pretty far-fetched. One that annoyed me was a woman seeing the killer for a few seconds in a stressful situation and helping the FBI get a sketch and giving them an accurate and detailed description. Perhaps she was a savant, but for the length of time that she saw him and based on what he was wearing, I don’t think that was realistic. 

The other thing is that while the killer is careful and has some basic knowledge of how to cover his tracks, he makes pretty basic errors, like buying his supplies all at one place (Home Depot). Strange that because for everything else he got, stuff was bought and ordered at different times and different retailers. It almost came across as an advertisement for Home Depot.

The other thing is that the killer (and his brother) seemed unaware of the possibility of cellular phones being monitored. It’s a clever twist, but even long before the public confirmation, there were fairly strong rumors (and for many years) that phones were being monitored. This also involves the introduction of a character with amazing programming skills to the point that he invents technology on the fly that leads the FBI to the killer. That, to me, was also far-fetched. Probably not outside the realm of what a team of developers would be able to come up with after a few months of programming but, whatever; I’ll give him some artistic license in that. 

The other gripe I have is the ending. Let’s just say that it was a bit contrived. I mean, it’s a work of fiction, but the stuff that had to happen — and not happen — stretched my credulity a bit. I understand why he wanted it to end that way but still, I wasn’t happy.

Again, a part of my displeasure is that after all the careful planning and stuff, both the killer and the brother seemed less than astute and more careless than they were at the beginning of the book. 

There was also a very protracted and largely uninteresting and non-crucial part involving paramedics trying to save a shooting victim. This is in the book — I presume — because the author worked a stint as a flight medic. If you are interested in highly detailed descriptions of emergency medicine, you will enjoy this part. Personally, I didn’t see the point of it.

However, despite the slightly disappointing ending, I reiterate that I did like this book. An ending that was well-telegraphed ahead of time only slightly reduced my enjoyment of the reading experience. 

On a personal note, if I were to self-publish, this is the kind of quality I would strive for as far as characters, plot, editing, and general presentation. This felt like a professional offering and in fact the author hired professionals to present the book to his audience. 

What I don’t know is how confident he was in investing what must have been serious coins into the production of it without knowing how it would be received. It could be that his first release was not as slick as its present form and that the book has undergone significant improvements from its initial offering (this is the 9th edition). 

The book is offered for free and in this case, it’s not a bad idea since based on the quality of the offering it would likely translate into a good number of readers buying the sequels. No, I’m not one of those readers but then I’m a special case and not representative of typical readers. 

If you are looking for something to read in this genre, it’s worth checking out this free offering. 

My disclaimer:
Not much of a disclaimer for this review; I liked the book and consider it a decent offering. Any criticism of it relates more to my own personal preferences in what I read and doesn’t point to faults in the book itself. If the book sounds interesting, you should buy it (it’s free) and then let me know what you think. 

Anyway, this reawakens my desire to finish editing my own suspense-action-thriller-mystery offering and get it out there, although I would first try to sell it to a regular publisher.

That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.


Note: if you are not reading this blog post at, know that it has been copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intention, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.


Please, if you are considering bestowing me recognition beyond commenting below, refrain from doing so.  I will decline blogger-to-blogger awards.   I appreciate the intent behind it, but I prefer a comment thanking me for turning you away from a life of crime, religion, or making you a better person in some other way.  That would mean something to me.

If you wish to know more, please read below.

About awards: Blogger Awards
About “likes”:   Of “Likes”, Subscriptions, and Stuff

Note: to those who may click on “like”, or rate the post; if you do not hear from me, know that I am sincerely appreciative, and I thank you for noticing what I do.

. . .  my FP ward  . . . chieken shit.

Finally, if you interpret anything on this blog as me asking or wanting pity, sympathy, or complaining about my life, or asking for help and advice, know you’re  likely missing my subtle mix of irony, sarcasm, and humor.

About disperser

Odd guy with odd views living an odd life during odd times.
This entry was posted in Books, Opinions and Stuff, Writing Stuff and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Book Review – Closure: Jack Randall #1 by Randall Wood

  1. Perry Broxson says:

    Ah ha, so you can say nice-ish things about a book written by someone other than Emilio D’alise. Good to know. Could I kindly retain your critique services for the Fall of 2018 . . . when my book, the titillating, tantalizing, testosteronal Tribulation is completed?

    Interesting that this cat – Randall Wood – has self-published a stack of the novels. Wonder how he’s monetizing this hobby.

    And, oh, by the way, isn’t it kind of a dick move to name your main character after yourself? C’mon, Randall . . . ya betta than that.

    Good review. Even handed. Insightful. Makes me wanna give the guy an eyeball or two.




    • disperser says:

      Wait a second! You’re doing me a disservice . . . maybe.

      It’s true that I like what I write (one has to, or what’s the point!) but I don’t think that makes me overly negative or prone to snobbily dismiss other people’s writing.

      The thing is, with all entertainment vehicles, one tends to appreciate things they like and be annoyed with things they don’t. When I’m reviewing things, my criteria is simple: did it hold my interest? Did I empathize or otherwise cared what happened to the characters? Did the plot make sense? And — the most important — did the actions of the character make sense in relation to what people might do based on what I know of human nature?

      Even when I like the book — as this was the case — any failings in those areas will stand out for me and I’ll mention them.

      Also, reviewing is much different than Beta Reading.

      That said, Sure, you know you can always send me stuff for me to shred . . . er . . . fairly and objectively review.

      And, yeah, I thought the same thing about the name. I don’t typically look at author’s names when I get a book, so I noticed it only after I had read half the book, and that’s what I thought too. Perhaps the author self-identifying as the main character.

      As for the monetization, while I don’t know, I would assume the first book was probably done on the cheap and we are now seeing the result of a successful launch of a series of books.

      As for reading this, I thought you weren’t into this genre . . . because, you know, if you’re looking to read something like this, I have that one novel that I wouldn’t mind being looked at. I mean, it’s not quite like this, but action, suspense, intrigue, good gals and bad guys.


  2. I have a To Read List. I will add this book. It seems interesting.
    I’m always curious about where authors come up with the names for their characters and why. I’ve read books and seen movies where a title character had the same name as someone I knew. Ha. Always makes me laugh. And be baffled.
    HUGS!!! :-)


    • disperser says:

      One of the tools I use (Scrivener) has a built-in Name Generator. You can choose gender and ethnicity and whole name or just the first name or just the last name. It has a number of modern and ancient nationalities, and it can be helpful when coming up with names.

      Even so, I generally tweak made-up names a bit to make them less likely that someone in Europe, for instance, will read my stuff and I’m using the name of their uncle and me thinking it’s a really unique and exotic name.

      I came up with Russian names for the Michelle Maul stories using that tool. First names, I don’t worry too much about. Last names I generally want something that sounds real but might not be. Either that or the name is so generic (Bob) that it’s not going to jump out at anyone.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. renxkyoko says:

    I like a good murder story. I posted a photo of my bookshelf , and you can tell they are almost all murder / court trials/espionage mystery novels.


    • disperser says:

      This one is not bad.

      I don’t remember if you’ve read my stuff, but after writing a few of them, I’m leaning more toward staying with this genre for a while.


Voice your opinion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.