Man, oh man, could I write stuff . . . politics, religion, fake news . . . so much happens every day that one hardly has the time to formulate an opinion before one is slammed with the latest surreal event. 

As much as I could write, none of it would be fiction, and that’s a problem . . . I’ve not written any fiction now going on two months. I mean, what’s the point? Half the stuff I hear is way stranger, more engaging, more entertaining, scarier, and more out there than anything I could come up with. 

So, I play with photographs.


By the way, all of the photos (and their original versions) are in THIS SmugMug Gallery for them who want to see the originals. You can also click on the photos to have a larger version open up in a new window or tab. 

Anyway, since I got not fiction to share, I’ll share opinion snippets on various topics. I won’t go into long dissertations on each one because — frankly — I don’t think it matters what I say. In that regard, this is me venting for my own benefit, so that I might eventually move on with my life. 

First, something that fires up my annoyance to no end whenever I see it, hear it, or read about it. What am I referring to? 

I’m referring to finding the dumbest and strangest and most “out there” person and prop them up as representatives of the larger group one wants to denigrate. Unfortunately, neither the Left nor the Right is free of dumbasses willing to open their mouths and spew forth literal nonsense.  It’s usually a celebrity — they live on a different world plane — but it can be anyone. As long as the person says or does something stupid and you can loosely tie them to a Left or Right, man, do people eat that crap up.   

Imagine if we were judged by what our crazy Uncle Larry or weird Aunt Edna said . . . we would rightly and with great indignation point out that them two kooks don’t speak for us. 

We should expect more from our “news” organizations, but from observation, they are providing exactly what people want . . . which does not speak well of what people want or of people in general. 


Call it what you will — the mainstream media, the free press, or just press — the sad part is that we — this Republic — depend on a strong free press to help keep politicians in line.

Unfortunately, across the land and the world, newsrooms are being gutted of their investigative staff and replaced with entertainment writers. Even more disturbing, is what I call vanity press. For instance, much of Fox News and its bands of Foxtards played — throughout the election — the role of cheerleaders for Trump. Now, their chief job seems to be to assuage the worries of rational people whenever Trump does or says something that would worry any sane person. How can that be called “news”? Why is it called news?

While I admit the news can often be entertaining, what I’m looking for are facts and they are difficult to come by. On the other hand, Alternative Facts are a dime a dozen and because of it, facts have a difficult time rising above the fray and get noticed. 

The funny thing about alternative facts is that they used to be called “lies”. Apparently, we don’t do that anymore; we don’t call lies, lies and call liars, liars. 

Why, the Press Secretary at the White House stands at his little podium and thrice lies in just one session . . . and no one calls him on it. A roomful of reporters and not one stands up and says “You are either ignorant or a liar, but in either case, you are a disgrace to your post.” 

But he’s not, is he? Countless prior Press Secretaries had stood at that podium and lied. But, none so blatantly and with as much faux indignation as this guy; he’s almost as good a liar as the President. 

Any President.


Oh, I know, some people revere this or that President. I don’t understand it. 

At any given instance during any given administration, I can rattle off a number of things ranging from questionable to downright criminal that our CICs are either directly involved with or are “letting” happen. Sure, some are more egregious than others but that should not be an excuse for any of it. 


Honest, I had an idea for a short fiction piece, a fun one — at least for me — and what happens? Trump signs an ill-conceived travel ban. Well, all of a sudden I’m deep into the nuances of the arguments. 

I am not listening to cable news. They are offering opinions and interpretations colored through their own particular filters. No, I go and research what I know about these bans. Their history, their effectiveness, their legalities. 

I won’t debate the issue here, but one thing I know . . . the lens of history does not look upon these bans with fondness and favor. Going back literally to the beginning of our country, invariably we now look at all those bans as “not who we are, not what we are” . . . except, that’s not true. 

That is exactly who and what we are. Irrational and impulsive and cruel and selfish and ultimately destined to look like petty fools. Why we imagine this administration — and current citizens who voted them in power — to be any different than any that came before, I don’t know. Yes, I include the last administration as having paved the way for the actions of this administration. 

Actually, there is one more thing I know and it’s a bit confusing . . . while citing wanting to avoid another 9-11 attack as the reason for the order, the ban did not include the one country we know for sure was where the attackers came from. In fact, none of the countries listed can be directly tied to any of the attacks here, in the US.

And look! I too lied, for there is yet another thing.

I don’t know it for sure but I suspect at some point in the near future, we will be engaged in something Christians have fantasized about . . . full-on religious war. I do know for sure Christians are big on considering themselves martyrs and playing victims (it’s part of their core belief, to the point that they invent stuff even when their lives are pretty sweet) and there’s nothing better to bolster their self-worth than killing infidels in an apparent defense — and upholding of — their faith. Fundamentally, in the full sense of the word, there is little difference between Christians and Muslims. 


But, back to “the news”. I ‘m not optimistic. Even if we were to replenish the investigative ranks of news agencies, it’s likely no one will listen to them. 

You can see it at play, both on the Left and the Right. Namely, each side will only listen to news they “agree” with. Screw the facts, screw data . . . as Newt Gingrich said, what counts are emotions. 

Let me restate the frustrating part . . . you can show someone hard data, you can invite them to gather their own data, and they will still question and find suspect anything that does not agree with how they see the world. 

How do you argue against an imaginary “reality” when the persons adhering to it won’t accept facts? When the authorities in question take a page right out of 1984 and are willing to use Kim Jong-un’s playbook in dealing with criticism? 

By the way, if one listens to FoxNews, one might be surprised to hear them criticize Jong-un’s banning of sarcasm. I certainly was. I mean, FNtards are constantly berating people who use sarcasm in discussing religion, Republicans, Trump, and — of course — FoxNews themselves. 


There is so much I want to talk about . . .

Believe it or not, I actually keep a list. 

I come across something — usually while looking for something else — and my brain runs it through my processing unit. I then immediately have four or five things I would like to explore relating to what I heard. The problem is that ten minutes later, that’s all gone, replaced with something else. If I’m at home, I now write it down. 

One of the things I wrote down, is the following:

How long? How long before we have something resembling the McCarty era? Or, are we already in it?


Wait . . . I also have a public service announcement. 

Some of the newsletters I read — and even news outlets — point to an increased interest in gun ownership by “non-traditional” gun buyers. 

Yup. That would be Liberals, some of them Far Left.

While I welcome this apparent shift to rational thought with regard to gun ownership (something I’ve always advocated for everyone), I fear that inexperienced gun owners will result in an uptick in accidents, suicides, and shootings in general. 

Mind you, I’m not saying gun ownership is bad. I’m saying that guns in the hands of inexperienced individuals increase the likelihood of undesirable consequences. Much like giving a teenager — or an old man — a car that can go from zero-to-sixty in four seconds. 

Remember, gun ownership is not only a responsibility, but it’s also nearly useless and potentially dangerous if one is not willing to train and gain proficiency with said gun. That includes dispelling the Liberal ideas of what it means to own a gun. 

A gun will not make you a better person, will not keep you safer, will not gain you respect. It is — and should always be — a line of last resort. Along with buying that gun, try and get some proficiency in self-defense. Yes, that means some sort of fighting proficiency. Nothing John Statham-like; just enough to give you the chance to run away as opposed to getting beat up.

Carry alternatives means of defense (pepper spray, for instance). Be smart and situationally aware. Do not get yourself in situations where you need to pull a gun. If you have to pull a gun, make damn sure shooting it is the only option you have. 

This is where training and education come into play big time. Know what to expect once you discharge a weapon, especially if someone gets shot. No matter the circumstances, you will likely be arrested. Have lawyers you can call or better yet, join one of the organizations who provide legal advice if you happen to use a gun in a self-defense situation (murder someone and you are on your own). 

Most of all, make sure that if it comes to you firing a gun, that you are good at it. That you have trained. Poorly trained individuals can hurt others and likely get themselves killed, sometimes with their own gun. This happens to cops, and they are “professionals”. From the FBI statistics, of the cops that are shot, roughly 5% of cops, one in twenty, get shot with their own gun. 

While I welcome my new fellow gun owners . . . er . . . actually, I’m gunless at the moment, but I’m right there with you, in spirit. Anyway, while I welcome you, I urge you to take the step seriously. Be a smart and safe and proficient gun owner. 

One thing you should find (I can’t speak for everyone, but I can speak for everyone I know) is that other gun owners will care more about the fact that you want to learn about guns and not so much about your particular political or social or religious views. Try and reciprocate that. 


That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.


Note: if you are not reading this blog post at, know that it has been copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intention, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.


Please, if you are considering bestowing me recognition beyond commenting below, refrain from doing so.  I will decline blogger-to-blogger awards.   I appreciate the intent behind it, but I prefer a comment thanking me for turning you away from a life of crime, religion, or making you a better person in some other way.  That would mean something to me.

If you wish to know more, please read below.

About awards: Blogger Awards
About “likes”:   Of “Likes”, Subscriptions, and Stuff

Note: to those who may click on “like”, or rate the post; if you do not hear from me, know that I am sincerely appreciative, and I thank you for noticing what I do.

. . .  my FP ward  . . . chieken shit.

Finally, if you interpret anything on this blog as me asking or wanting pity, encouragement, or advice to better my life, know my subtle mix of irony, sarcasm, and humor is blowing right by you.

About disperser

Odd guy with odd views living an odd life during odd times.
This entry was posted in Effects and Filters, Opinions and Stuff, Politics, Religion, Writing Stuff and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Snippets

  1. sandra getgood says:

    As always, your pictures are fascinating. As far as the rest, I did read a little, and don’t feel any disagreement with what you say. But my head is spinning, and I’m trying to stay out of political discussions as much as I can, although I’m not ignoring the fact that our country is in trouble and we somehow have to wrestle our country away from a madman and his cronies. That’s about all I can say at the moment.

    Liked by 1 person

    • disperser says:

      I completely understand. For the most part, I’m staying away from a lot of it. What little I write here is but a poor substitute for all I feel I should be doing. The problem is that the conversations are dominated by extremes on both sides and it makes having a conversation practically impossible.

      At this particular moment, anger and resentment, and ideology are driving matters and that is a recipe for disaster.

      It’s also important to remember that life goes on . . . but, dang, some people are sure hell-bent on making it as difficult as possible.

      The flowers are my escape when I want to shut myself off from the literal madness that seems to have engulfed the world.


  2. oneowner says:

    I like these flower shots (shots – get it. Guns. Shots. Never mind.) I haven’t been as creative with the plugins on flowers but I should give it a try. Whenever we get flowers. Won’t be soon, though.


    • disperser says:

      Thanks. Most of these are from archives going back a number of years.

      I’m still searching for a good application of the Glow 2 plugin and the Texture 2 plugin . . . while they can generate some interesting results, they are highly dependent on the original and even then most of the effects seem (to me) overdone. Impressions, Adjust, Restyle, and Simplify are applicable to a wider range of photos as are the Nick Collection.


  3. Keep playing with your photos! These are stunning! Before you played with them…they are amazing art. After you played with them…they are a different, but still amazing art. Your photos are a beautiful, appreciated escape from the ugly that is going on in our country.
    HUGS!!! :-)


    • disperser says:

      Thanks. I do plan to keep on playing around with different effects and treatments. The variations are near-infinite although my time is anything but.

      As for what’s happening . . . it’s hard to believe it’s only been two weeks since the inauguration. I think the wannabe-little-dictator is going to alienate a lot of people, including those in his own party. Unfortunately, I think they still see him as useful to further their own agenda. Sad. So sad.

      Still, we must find the little joys and go on . . . like, for instance, I want one of these.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. mvschulze says:

    License assault weapons and multi clipped guns. Make them illegal. Make it a national agenda as our former President wanted in the wake of Sandy Hook. Stop the wrong people from getting these weapons (might as well include bomb making materials here…) by any and all means. [Imagine these weapons are still openly available at retail stores, gun shows..(AHHH it’s all insane!!!)] It’s OUR problem, not the world’s. Why do we need to give up our values in the face of the rest of the world because we simply can’t handle it ourselves. Re-define the NRA’s purpose. Encourage THEM, the NRA, to work together with the sane people of this country to solve this issue. M ☹


    • disperser says:

      . . . uh . . . not sure how this ties into with Liberals buying guns. The “assault weapons” issues have been explored every which way and back.

      Know that my views on gun control and regulations have been expressed many times on this blog. I agree with some suggestion, disagree with many others. In the argument about long guns and clips, the discussion is not as easy as people make it seem.

      For instance, it was astonishing to me to hear Democrats (after years of saying how bad gun violence is in America) and Republicans (after years of saying gun violence is not that bad and that we are safer than we have been for the last fifty years) all of a sudden switch sides. Trump accused Obama of not doing enough to curb violence in cities, especially Chicago, and Democrats countered that we live in a time with the lowest assault and murder rate in fifty years. Which then begs the question as to what we were arguing about to begin with. Oh, yah . . . ideology, not facts.

      In case it’s not clear, assault weapons are rifles that someone wants to label as assault weapons. Actual assault weapons are only in use by police and Military (who regularly lose them and that then find their way into the hands of criminals). You and I cannot legally own assault weapons and no one is suggesting we should be allowed to have them (except maybe a few kooks).

      This is one of my posts from near the time of the shooting:

      The underlying reason for my views on guns and gun control are summarized here:

      Again, I’m a strong proponent of gun control. But only in the same way that I am a strong proponent of licensing drivers and making sure they are safe and responsible drivers. That is, not with the idea to curtail, but rather to truly control and minimize what we know cannot be eliminated and what I believe should not be eliminated.


      • mvschulze says:

        I’m a little craized lately, and maybe a little too liberal with my typing…. but lots of things are bothering me these days. Thanks for your comments and links. Your viewpoints are always of interest to me. I’ll be slowly reading on. M :-)


      • disperser says:

        I absolutely do not mind, and lots of things are bothering me these days as well. It’s only been two weeks since the inauguration and it already seems like months.

        I responded because I wasn’t sure how it tied in with the above, but also because the whole gun issue is one of the things I do care about quite a lot, if not perhaps in the same way other people care about it.

        The second link I gave is a post where I link two articles by Sam Harris. I think they are well worth reading regardless of one’s view of guns. From my point of view, it voices many aspects of my own thinking, but even those who don’t agree can benefit from at least understanding why someone like me thinks the way they do.

        In Colorado, I had a license to carry. Here, it’s difficult getting one (as in near-impossible unless you know someone). It irks me a bit that after going through proficiency and legal training, after being vetted by three different law enforcement groups, the state does not trust me with a gun. Most of all, I see it the opposite of keeping me safe.

        Anyway, another place, another time, but if you do read those articles, I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts about them, and no, you don’t have to agree with me. If you want to read my thought on gun control, just look under “Musings Stuff” and “Guns”.


    • disperser says:

      By the way, notice my prediction of Democrats screaming bloody murder when Republicans would come into power and use Executive Orders as opposed to working through the legislative branches. That was in 2013.

      We are now going to reap the rewards of hubris and opportunistic actions of Democrats during the Obama years, including the changing of the rules of the Senate.


  5. these images are very beautiful!! I’m glad the average citizen can’t legally carry guns in Canada.


  6. That mongrel owner of Fox rupert murdock is the vilest creature ever to be spawned in Australia, and his mother was one of the greatest, a wonderful woman indeed!


  7. AnnMarie says:

    Original or processed, your photos uplift and refresh.


Voice your opinion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.