Writing Update and Cruisers X – The Details Part I

I’ve not started editing my NaNoWriMo No. 3 (a. k. a. NNWM-2K15) because I’ve been busy with other stuff and because I’m still letting it simmer. 

I have, however, been sending out a few things. So far, I’ve had three rejections for my short stories. Two from Asimov’s Science Fiction and one from Clarkesworld Magazine. I’ve not yet heard from Analog SF/SF and Tor. Of the fifteen agents I queried with my 2014 NNWM, ten have either declined or their stated maximum response time has lapsed by multiple weeks, and hence can be considered as not interested. 

None of the rejections were of a personal nature. For them who don’t know, I’ve worked out there are three types of rejections.  

  1. The “how dare you even contact us” is characterized by a lack of response. When you submit, you’re often informed that “if you don’t hear from us in X-number of weeks, you can assume we thought your stuff was crap and we are amazed you had the audacity to query it”. The ‘X’ varies from four weeks to as long as six months.  
  2. The “form letter rejection” is self-explanatory and falls into two camps. The first I call the “it’s not you, it’s us” camp and says something like “thanks for wasting our time with stuff we don’t need at this time”. To their credit, the wording is a little more polite that that, but I know what they mean. The second I call the “it could possibly be you” camp and it says something along the lines of “we did not connect with your submission, and by the way, here are some helpful links about the craft of writing”. I don’t know . . . I assume they are trying to be nice, but it still sounds a lot like “wow, we’ve not seen drek like this since grade school, and speaking of which, perhaps you should consider going back to one”, you know, suggesting I should go to a trade school. Into welding, perhaps. 
  3. The “oh, so close; keep trying” takes the form of a more personalized letter explaining in detail what they hated about your story. From reading the oracle that is the Internet, I gather this is the desirable form of rejection. Apparently people like reading that what they thought was their best work is not quite there yet. I guess I’ll see how I feel if I ever get one of these. 

Now, I get that everyone is pretty busy these days, what with Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram, and all them other wonderful tools designed to improve one’s efficiency and productivity.    

Still, it would be nice if agents and editors would have different types of form letters they sent out. That’s what I would do in their place. I’d have X-number of pre-formatted letters where ‘X’ is ten.  

So, for instance, Number 6 might be something like:

Thank you for sending us your hard work. We understand you put your soul into this (unless you’re Disperser; he’s soulless), and it was not bad. However, your story did not sufficiently distinguish itself from the other submissions we received. We want you to know there’s nothing wrong with your writing, and it’s maybe a cut above the rest, but you need to be more creative with the characters and/or story ideas. Thank you for the opportunity to see your work. 

That lets the writer know they have what it takes as far as writing, but need to work on the story content. 

On the other hand, Number 4 might read something like this: 

Thank you for sending us your hard work. We understand you put your soul into this (unless you’re Disperser; he’s soulless), and it was not bad. However, while this was a unique and interesting concept that held our interest, the writing itself is not up to publishing quality. Were we a charitable organization, or if this were the 1950s, we would work with you to clean up this mess and get it publishable. Unfortunately, it’s 2016, and there are literally tens of thousands of writers who are farther along in their craft than you are, so we have no incentive or interest in nurturing whatever talent you might have. Thank you for the opportunity to see your work.

Just to bookend this thought exercise, Number 1 might read something like: 

Holy crap on virtual paper! Are you Disperser, by any chance? We ask because this has no soul, and we understand he’s soulless. Seriously, dude! What were you thinking? Did Fred in Marketing put you up to this? You tell Fred I’m going to get him for this! See what you did? I’m using exclamations point! AARRGH!  

Number 1o might read something like: 

This was a joy to read. The characters had our hearts swell with our love for them, and the plot was like a gentle breeze filling the sails of our souls. We’ve not seen anything like this and doubt we will see the like again in our lifetime. We would like to offer . . . Wait . . . You’re that soulless dude, Disperser, ain’t you? Never mind.  

Anyway, I’ll keep submitting. From what I understand, perseverance often counts more than talent. I guess the whole point of the exercise is to keep submitting stuff until you break their will to live. I can do that. 

##

Cruisers Update X – The Details Part I

Continuing with my late reporting of the June 14, 2015, Tri-Lakes Vintage Car show.

After I got done photographing nearly each car at the show (I ignored the more modern cars, a.k.a. classics-to-be), I went around again taking a bunch of closeups. Some call them ‘macros’, whatever that means. I say that because it seems to me ‘micros’ might be a more appropriate term. I suppose one could assume it’s derived from making small things appear large, but English not being my first language, I can’t say. 

14JUNE2015 Tri-Lakes Car Show

By the way, there is a SmugMug Gallery (HERE) for this, past, and future posts about this show. Also, you can click on the photos to open a larger version of the photo in a separate tab or window. Go ahead; try it.

Some might argue that first shot is not much of a macro. OK, I’ll give you that, but I can’t help if the name was all stretched out across the back. OK, OK, I’ll keep the rest more in the realm of ‘macros’.

20150614_DSC9900_1_DSC9900_DIGI

Now, some people will be positively giddy at seeing the shallow depth of field. Good for them. 

Me? I was not happy when I saw these. I prefer my stuff in focus, so I consider many of the macros big failures flags waving in Force 12 Gale Winds. Then again, I ain’t a pro, so I’ll cut myself some slack.

20150614_DSC9901_1_DSC9901_DIGI

Other fudge cracker! That sucks! . . . breathe . . . breathe . . . OK, I’m alright now. 

20150614_DSC9902_1_DSC9902_DIGI

Grand danish, that’s bad. Oh well . . . 

20150614_DSC9903_1_DSC9903_DIGI

That’s more like it! In fact, I like it so much I’ll do a B&W version.

20150614_DSC9903_1_DSC9903-Processed_DIGI

Here’s another Mustang closeup . . . 

20150614_DSC9904_1_DSC9904_DIGI

And here’s the corresponding B&W . . . 

20150614_DSC9904_1_DSC9904-Processed_DIGI

As a change of pace, I’ll give you the B&W version first and then the color original. Ain’t I a pistol?

20150614_DSC9905_1_DSC9905_DIGI

20150614_DSC9905_1_DSC9905-Processed_DIGI

Lest some color purists are cringing at the thought of an endless series of B&W photos coupled with their color counterparts, not all color photos lend themselves to a B&W conversion (some may differ in that opinion). 

This next one most certainly does. 

20150614_DSC9906_1_DSC9906_DIGI

But, I did not do one.

20150614_DSC9907_1_DSC9907_DIGI

Some might recognize that emblem as two flags waving. If you can’t see it, try leaning back on your chair (or move the phone farther from your face) and squinting. 

Here is a more reasonable “Pontiac” badge that possibly still qualifies as a macro.

20150614_DSC9908_1_DSC9908_DIGI

As I walked around and concentrated on the various details, I tried envisioning the end product. Some say I have an eye for photography, but it’s actually a Nikon. The Macro lens is also a Nikon. 

20150614_DSC9909_1_DSC9909_DIGI

Notice that I’m not identifying any of these, proof positive that I’m not anywhere close to being what anyone might consider a car guy. 

This next one looks like one of them Aztec emblems. I didn’t know they made cars. 

20150614_DSC9910_1_DSC9910_DIGI

Tsk, tsk . . . visible screws. Those Aztecs have a thing or two to learn about aesthetics. 

But, they sure made purty wheels. It stands to reason; some think wheels were man’s first invention after porn, so we’d had lots of time to perfect them.

20150614_DSC9911_1_DSC9911_DIGI

Now, I bet you think I forgot all about doing monochrome conversions . . . not so. Witness!

20150614_DSC9912_1_DSC9912_DIGI

20150614_DSC9912_1_DSC9912-Processed_DIGI

What is unique about that shot is that it has a reflection of me taking the photo. I tried in earnest avoiding such mishaps, but sometimes it cannot be helped.

I assume this next shot is from the same vehicle as I can’t believe there would be two cars with similar logos. 

20150614_DSC9913_1_DSC9913_DIGI

20150614_DSC9913_1_DSC9913-Processed_DIGI

However one feels about old cars, one has to admit to a fair amount of character evident in the various adorning badges. 

Even when fairly simple, they could still be classy.

20150614_DSC9915_1_DSC9915_DIGI

You could even label them as elegant once transformed by the magic of monochrome.

20150614_DSC9915_1_DSC9915-2_DIGI

Some badges have an inherent power that has nothing to do with how they look and more about what they invoke. 

20150614_DSC9916_1_DSC9916_DIGI

Of course, I maintain a decent B&W conversion can only help. 

20150614_DSC9916_1_DSC9916-2_DIGI

But, yes . . . even unadulterated, the mere sight of the badge can evoke memories of rampant optimism and the very air choked with the lead residue of high octane fuel. 

20150614_DSC9917_1_DSC9917_DIGI

I’m not sure which German division this was, but I’m sure it instilled fear in the hearts of its enemies. 

20150614_DSC9918_1_DSC9918_DIGI

20150614_DSC9918_1_DSC9918-2_DIGIThis next badge if tame in comparison.

20150614_DSC9919_1_DSC9919_DIGI

It has kind of a dainty ring to it, don’t it?

Our first car was a 1965 Impala, and hence, I’m still partial to the shape of these tail lights.

20150614_DSC9920_1_DSC9920_DIGI

Here’s another classy hood and grille combo . . . 

20150614_DSC9921_1_DSC9921_DIGI

20150614_DSC9922_1_DSC9922_DIGI

. . . and yet another . . . 

20150614_DSC9923_1_DSC9923_DIGI

20150614_DSC9924_1_DSC9924_DIGI

I kind of miss this next type of hood ornament . . . I mean, if you’re making the effort to hit a pedestrian, you might as well have something on the hood that can easily rip them open. 

20150614_DSC9925_1_DSC9925_DIGI

Sigh . . . those were the days. 

It’s not just hoods that were adorned with classy badges. I’ll end this short post with a shot of a trunk release handle. 

20150614_DSC9926_1_DSC9926_DIGI

20150614_DSC9926_1_DSC9926-Processed_DIGI

And now, as I hit publish, I’ll marvel at getting a couple of “likes” within a minute of this post going live from people who could not possibly have read any part of it. 

That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.

<><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><>

Note: if you are not reading this blog post at DisperserTracks.com, know that it has been copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intention, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.

<><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><><><o><><><><><><><>

Please, if you are considering bestowing me recognition beyond commenting below, refrain from doing so.  I will decline blogger-to-blogger awards.   I appreciate the intent behind it, but I prefer a comment thanking me for turning you away from a life of crime, religion, or making you a better person in some other way.  That would mean something to me.

If you wish to know more, please read below.

About awards: Blogger Awards
About “likes”:   Of “Likes”, Subscriptions, and Stuff

Note: to those who may click on “like”, or rate the post; if you do not hear from me, know that I am sincerely appreciative, and I thank you for noticing what I do.

. . .  my FP ward  . . . chieken shit.