Chicago – 2008

In 2008 we had a short visit to the middle of Illinois. While there, Melisa had the opportunity to go see a play in Chicago, a 3.5 hours drive from where we were. The play was Jersey Boys, the plan was to head up to Chicago, see the play, and get back down where we were staying.

I had no interest in the play, and since she was going with her sister, I suggested they just drop me off at the Millennium Park. Well, not just me . . . me and my camera, both.

And so it was I got these photos.

One of the first things I saw was the Crown Fountain.


These are big interactive fountains set in shallow tapered pools. The big murals offer changing faces with various expressions. As can be seen, the water feature is enjoyed by all sorts of people.


Where is the fountain, you ask?


Of course, it’s not just older people who enjoy the water.


Next, I saw this plant. I thought it was neat . . .


I have no clue what it is.

But what I had really come to see was The Bean.


10854_MISC_091908_2-2_DIGIThey call it The Bean, but it’s actually the Cloud Gate. Here’s the Wiki excerpt for them too lazy to click on the link:

Cloud Gate is a public sculpture by Indian-born British artist Anish Kapoor, that is the centerpiece of AT&T Plaza at Millennium Park in the Loop community area of Chicago, Illinois. Constructed between 2004 and 2006, the sculpture is nicknamed The Bean because of its bean-like shape. Made up of 168 stainless steel plates welded together, it’s highly polished exterior has no visible seams. It measures 33 by 66 by 42 feet (10 by 20 by 13 m) and weighs 110 short tons (100 t; 98 long tons).

It is a visually striking piece; one that keeps drawing one’s eye—and one’s camera—to it.



By the way, the early afternoon sun reflects from it something fierce. A difficult thing to photograph. I did the best I could.

People seem to like getting under it, in part because of the crazy reflections. I did not get under there with the camera because it was both crowded and difficult to photograph from up-close.



I think that now I could photograph the underside either with my 10-20mm or my Samsung. Of course, I’d have to mingle with people to do so . . . I think I’ll pass. If you want to see what it looks like under there, plan a trip.

I managed to hide myself in the reflection for most of the photos, but these next two are likely my very first selfies . . .



I really like this next photo, but wished I had left more room below the pigeon.


This is a bit more of a close-up . . .


. . . and this shows you where I took those two photos from . . .


By the way, for them interested in architecture, and specifically Chicago architecture, then you should read THIS, and THIS, and THIS.

FYI, that site has architecture guides to a number of cities around the world. She’s also involved in THIS which might be of interest to travelers.

I should mention something else . . . all of these photos were snapped with my trusty Nikon D100. Honest, that camera was, and still is, very good in the right conditions.

If I could, I would take the resolution and low-light performance of the D7000, add to it the burst speed and buffer of the D200, and finish up with the color engine of the D100.


That’s part of the Jay Pritzker Pavillion . . . I had more photos of it, but they are not currently loaded on my computer. That means at one time I thought they were crap and got rid of them. Of course, with new post-processing technology one can even make crap look good. Still, not motivated enough to go dig them out.


I walked around a bit more looking at a few sculptures . . .



. . . and one more shot of The Bean . . .


. . . before crossing the BP Pedestrian Bridge and making my way to the lakeshore. I had photos of it, too, but probably not good enough to keep. The bridge is best viewed from the air, and one can find plenty of aerial views of it online.



I might have mentioned before that I like marinas, boats, and the idea, if not the actual experience, of sailing open waters.

However, the destination was not the marina per se, but the Navy Pier.

The above photos, like this next photo, were shot on the way to the pier.


So . . . Navy Pier . . . here’s a few approach photos.






Surprisingly, the place was not very crowded . . . a joy, that.


It’s nice to see adults remembering what it’s like being a kid again.

Were it not for my suspicious engineering nature, my understanding of kinetic energy, my awareness of fatigue failures, why, I might have considered taking a spin.


A tad safer, and also not crowded, the Ferris wheel is another option, but I was on a schedule. I settled for photos.

The glass enclosure houses plants that would not survive the Chicago winters . . .


They also had water features that always capture my attention . . . arching streams of water that shoot from one flower bed to another.



Back outside, more photo opportunities . . .



Very colorful places and prime targets from creative post-processing . . . probably for a different post.



The darkening of the sky tells me I probably had my polarizing filter on the lens, something I should get back to using more often.

No, nothing political; an actual filter.

Here’s a couple of ‘artistic’ shots . . . or what passes for artistic on this blog.



I did walk through the buildings, and there were interesting displays I would have gladly spent time examining, but I was on the clock and did not have long before heading back and meeting my soulmate at The Bean.

I did take the time to shoot the lighthouse and a tour boat under full sail.




The above and the next two were shot from the end of the pier.



On the way back I shot a couple of more ‘evocative’ photos. They evoke a Ferris wheel.



On the way back to the rendezvous point, I lingered a bit at the marina for some late-light shots.




In case anyone wants to know where the Columbia Yacht Club resides . . . 


Probably my favorite boat photos from that stroll are these two:



. . . especially the first shot which reminds me of something one might see in the harbor of a small coastal town as opposed to a marina in Chicago. For them who did not notice, that’s the Adler Planetarium in the background.

Back at The Bean I met up with the love of my life and we walked around a bit. The sun was no longer high enough to hit The Bean, but it still kissed the sides of the surrounding buildings.




These lighting conditions pushed the capability of the D100. I loved the camera, but a low-light shooter it was not.

However, my post-processing tools are much better now, so I can show these shots with reasonable quality. For whatever reason, the park, plaza, and surrounding area now had more people enjoying the place.



We wanted to leave before it got dark, so I stole a few more shots of the Bean, and then we left.




As usual, dear reader, you can click on any of the photos to open them in a separate tab or window with the largest side at 1280pixels. If you want to see the original-sized photos, they are in the SmugMug Gallery HERE.

The gallery contains a few additional photos. Be aware the originals are not that much larger since the D100 was only a 6MP camera . . . less than the resolution of the camera on my phone.

That’s it. This post has ended . . . except for the stuff below.

 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o o o o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Dark High Noise

Dark High Noise

Astute persons might have noticed these doodles, and correctly surmised they hold some significance for me, and perhaps for humanity at large.  

If you click on the doodle, and nothing happens, this is the link it’s supposed to go to:


Note: if you are not reading this blog post at, know that it has been copied without permission, and likely is being used by someone with nefarious intention, like attracting you to a malware-infested website.  Could be they also torture small mammals.


Please, if you are considering bestowing me recognition beyond commenting below, refrain from doing so.  I will decline blogger-to-blogger awards.   I appreciate the intent behind it, but I prefer a comment thanking me for turning you away from a life of crime, religion, or making you a better person in some other way.  That would mean something to me.

If you wish to know more, please read below.

About awards: Blogger Awards
About “likes”:   Of “Likes”, Subscriptions, and Stuff

Note: to those who may click on “like”, or rate the post; if you do not hear from me, know that I am sincerely appreciative, and I thank you for noticing what I do.

. . .  my FP ward  . . . chieken shit.

About disperser

Odd guy with odd views living an odd life during odd times.
This entry was posted in Photography Stuff, Sculpture, Travel Stuff and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Chicago – 2008

  1. oneowner says:

    I was very impressed with the number and quality of public art pieces in Chicago. Some friends say that you can get an outstanding rib dinner there but I’ll have to try that for myself on my next visit. Excellent shots, btw, One of my friends had the D100 and I was really impressed with it at the time. Still a decent camera, too.


    • disperser says:

      Having lived in Chicago, I have very little desire to return to it . . . or any big city, for that matter.

      That said, there is a lot of neat attractions there, and those I do plan to visit again.

      I recently cleaned and prepped the D100 . . . I plan to do some comparative shoots using the D100, D200, and the D7000.


      • oneowner says:

        I’m interested in this comparison. I came this close (holding thumb and index finger 1/2 mm apart) to getting the D7000 two years ago but instead got the D600 (because of my old full frame lenses).


        • disperser says:

          One other thing . . . most of my lenses are FX lenses. I don’t recall reading FX lenses having any issues with DX cameras. The only advantage I see to using DX lenses is they are usually cheaper because they are labeled as consumer as opposed to pro or semi-pro.

          Had you read something different?


      • disperser says:

        . . . crap! . . . now I have to do it! However, all three cameras are DX.

        One thing I need to check and get a refresh on is the relationship of pixel size between the cameras. I’ve not read about it in a long while, but if memory serves me correctly larger pixel sizes are better for some things. Of course, higher pixel densities allow for more detail when cropping. What surprises me is how often I look at an old D100 photo and it strikes me as being sharper when in fact it’s not. This could be the fewer pixel or the color engine.

        . . . I’ll have to find those articles . . .


        • oneowner says:

          I have trouble trying to tell the difference between FX and DX without looking at both 1:1. Or possibly in a print say 16×20 side by side of the same subject. It’s impossible on the Web.


        • disperser says:

          Not having a FX camera, I can’t make the comparison. Not sure what one would see other than the newer FX camera have higher pixel counts. Although, that was not always the case. I doubt I’ll ever own an FX body unless the price drastically drops or I go pro. Neither are likely.


  2. sandra getgood says:

    Chicago looks like an interesting place. Well, maybe not in the winter, unless you’re a polar bear, but these pictures make it seem an inviting place to visit. And colorful!


    • disperser says:

      Like most cities, they have some very nice stuff to balance out the negative stuff. This is an example of a very nice area to visit and experience.

      . . . plus, The Bean . . . how cool is that!?


  3. seekraz says:

    What an enjoyable post, Emilio….truly…a wonderful assortment of things and colors. Very nice. :)


  4. Wow! What unique cool shots you got! Great job! :-) Love your takes on the Crown Fountain, Ferris Wheel, and The Bean! :-) It would be a hard choice for me…to see all that cool art and stuff! Or go see Jersey Boys. Hmm…I think I would of went with Melisa to see Jersey Boys! I love that play! :-)
    HUGS!!! :-)


  5. Wow that fountain is amazing! Very unique. An interesting post Emilio :)


  6. Virginia Duran says:

    Wonderful captures! And thanks for all the mentions :)
    Traveling there this Saturday- so excited!


  7. mvschulze says:

    A couple of things here: 1.) I love the post and can relate as some years ago I left home (NJ) at a normal time, flew to Chicago, walked all over, climbed some tall buildings, took a mess of photos with my new Canon Rebel, and got back home that evening. No one even suspected where I had been. 2.) Did Melissa like the play? 3.) I suspect that is you and her reflected in the egg near the end. M😊, currently in Florida with J and Sandy Paws to escape the cold!


    • disperser says:

      1) yes, this was something like that.
      2) yes, she raved about it (p.s. Melisa, one ‘s’ – not a big deal, just fyi)
      3) nope. The only occurrence of either of us are my reflections in the middle of the post. I was wearing a wide-brim hat and carrying a couple of bags of lenses.

      Florida would be nice; we did that last year . . . we are currently in the middle of another blizzard . . . today and for the next three days we’re getting cold and snow.

      On the other hand, because of the recent warm spell, I noticed some of my daffodils are already a few inches tall . . . they’re likely gonna die.


  8. AnnMarie says:

    Beautiful photos reflecting a beautiful city. You’ve definitely showcased one of it’s best assets.


Voice your opinion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.